NORDHAVNEN'S LIVING LAB Jun. 2013 | Page 29

? A ! B C

! !

Task B-10 : Identify what aspects of the experiment could be altered for a certain test period , if the experiment does not develop as expected . Task B-11 : Identify what assumptions and hampering regulations , that are present in the planning system might have to be reconsidered .
Car sharing : Inspirational questions :
Question BQ-1 : How can a high level of integration with other modes of transport be obtained ? Question BQ-1-1 : Should physical proximity of car sharing stations to public transport be guaranteed ? Question BQ-1-2 : Should payment schemes be integrated , for instance through rejsekort ? Question BQ-1-3 : Should car sharing be integrated into rejseplan ? Question BQ-1-4 : Can the car sharing system be connected to a bike rental scheme ? Could some of the cars be substituted with cargo bikes , long johns or tandem bikes ? Question BQ-2 : What legal issues arise when providing parking space for car sharing vehicles , and how are these issues best dealt with ? Question BQ-3 : How is the experiment communicated to different actors and user groups ? Question BQ-3-1 : How are households addressed ? Is there special conditions for households not owning a car ? Question BQ-3-2 : What specific features are geared towards company customers ? Question BQ-3-3- : Does it make sense to include the municipal or other actor ’ s car park into the car sharing scheme ?
Question BQ-4 : What is lacking in the car sharing service in comparison with the convenience of privately owned cars , from a user ’ s perspective ? Question BQ-4-1 : Do the users need child seats , trailers , a roof box ? Question BQ-4-2 : Can equipment stations be added on to the car sharing stands , in order to make the service more interesting for different clients of the service ?
Question BQ-5 : What type of car sharing payment scheme provides the right incentives ?

15