Naturally Unnatural Issue #7 6th June 2017 | Page 6
Issue #7, 6th June 2017
The UK needs more
than just a foundation
of environmentally
friendly policies
By Matthew Clifton
The UK needs to step up when it comes
to energy, environment and climate
change. With Donald Trump pulling
out of the Paris Climate Agreement and
saying he wants to negotiate a better
deal for the US, the UK needs to step-up
post Brexit and say, “we will commit to
measures that will ensure our planets
survival for years to come” along with
a clear and coherent plan on how to do
this. Unfortunately, only one major par-
ty is taking the threat of climate change
and environmentalism seriously, the
Labour party.
Theresa May and the Conservatives have
been somewhat evasive on the issue and
haven’t offered much in the way of pro-
gress. They have also failed fundamental-
ly when in government this year over
warnings about air pollution.
The £600 million into zero- emission vehi-
cles are simply not enough to encourage
innovation. The litter problem isn’t a soci-
etal one, it is companies who have created
blame onto ordinary people, so that they
don’t have to invest as much into creating
better and more environmentally friendly
packaging.
They have also said that they will no long-
er pursue the ban on ivory despite them
stating as a government, they were com-
mitted to that policy and after previously
contacting them before the general elec-
tion they ‘confirmed’ they were commit-
ted but failed to reply to our question ask-
ing if they were going to pursue a ban oth-
er than the one proposed in 2015. There is
a very little mention on their sustainable
energy policy apart from what we already
know with fracking and nuclear being
their preferences.
proved through a bottle deposit scheme
on a scale we need to. Whilst the manifes-
to states they will work with manufactur-
ers, they need to clamp down hard on
them. Labour will invest more into sustain-
able energy and other avenues that will
lead to a more sustainable future. They
also plan to introduce a complete ban on
ivory.
Publicly underrated is-
sues
Both parties have more details on what
their plans are and this is a brief analysis,
however, just as an overview only Labour
The Conser vatives
really offer a foundation of something pro-
gressive but it still lacks in dealing with
A 25-year Environment Plan which in-
cludes Blue Belt for marine protection,
some issues that we face. Whilst the ivory
every vehicle to be zero-emissions by
trade ban from Labour is a start, environ-
2050, with £600 million investment to
mental crime is a global issue and we
achieve this and action against litter pro-
need to face the fact that it costs the global
gramme with comprehensive rubbish and
economy an estimated 91-258 billion USD
recycling collection plus support of better Labour
per year, this places it as the fourth larg-
packaging.
est criminal activity in the world behind
A ban on fracking, a new clean air act,
The policies don’t sound too bad howev-
plastic bottle deposit scheme and reduc- drug trafficking (344 billion USD), coun-
er, the 25-year plan would be a fantastic
tions in food waste, along with prioritising terfeit crimes (288 billion USD) and human
idea if the plan itself would be plausible,
trafficking (157 billion USD). But this also
sustainable farming, food and fishing
but a Blue Belt for marine protection will
has a more profound effect, that it damag-
through investment into technology and
be difficult and it will open all sorts of con-
es the global eco-systems that we rely on
innovation and the promotion of cruelty-
stitutional issues when negotiating with
for the foundations of development,
free animal husbandry.
the EU over sea territory. The issue with
health, food securities and economies.
A ban on fracking is good along with the
marine life, is that it doesn’t have the
Ecosystems provide clean water, air and a
same climatic barriers as land-based ani- new clean air act however, the same issue supply of food which impacts physical and
of tackling the issue of large companies
mals and they have no restrictions on
mental wellbeing.
producing waste plastic will not be im-
where they can migrate to.
Continued on page 7...
6