MATÉRIA DE CAPA
REFERÊNCIAS
1. Pingala. Binary numbers in Ancient India.
Wikipedia. Acesso em: 29-11-2016.
2. Leibniz G. Explication de l´Arithmétique
Binaire. p.1703-5.
3. Petzold C. Code. Th e Hidden Language of
Computer Hardware and Soft ware. Redmond:
Microfost Press, 2000.
4. Richmond C. Obituary – Sir Godfr ey Houns-
fi eld. BMJ 2004;329(7467):687 (doi:10.1136/
bmj.329.7467.687).
5. Dicom. ACR Nema Standards Publication 1985.
Disponível em .
6. McGivney G, Haughton V, Strandt JA, Eichholz JE,
Lubar DM. A comparison of computer-assisted
tomography and data-gathering modalities in
Prosthodontics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
1986;1(1):55-68.
7. Schawrz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML,
Chafetz N. Computed tomography: Part I.
Preoperative assessment of the mandible
for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:137-41.
8. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML,
Chafetz N. Computed tomography: part
II. Preoperative assessment of the maxila
for endosseous implant surgery. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:143-8.
9. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT,
Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine
for dental imaging based on the cone-beam
technique: preliminar results. Eur Radiol
1998;8:1558-64.
10. Barker TM, Earwaker WJS, Frost N. Integration
of 3D medical imaging and rapid prototyping
to creat stereolitographic models. Australas
Phys Eng Sci Med 1993;16(2):79-85.
11. Wouters K. What is the Phidias Network? Phidias
Newslett er 1998;1.
12. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam
CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North
Am 2008;52:707-30.
13. Reiz SD, Neugebauer J, Karapetian VE, Ritt er L.
Cerec meets Galileos- integrated Implantology
for completely virtual implant planing. Int J
Comput Dent 2014;17(2):145-57.
14. Joda T, Brågger U, Gallucci GO. Systematic
literature reivew of digital three-dimensional
superimposition techniques to create virtual
dental patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
2015;30(2):330-7.
15. Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R,
Helmrot E, Benic G et al. EAO Guidelines for the
use of diagnostic imaging in implant Dentistry
2011. A consensus workshop organized by the
European Association for Osseointegration at
the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral
Implants Res 2012;23:1243-53.
26
INPerio 2017;2(1):18-26
16. Dula K, Benic GI, Dagassan-Berndt D, Filippi
A, Hichlin S, Kissling-Jeger F et al. SADMFR
Guidelines for the use of cone-beam computed
tomography/digital volume tomography. Swiss
Dent J 2015;125(9):945-53.
17. Januario AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR. Soft
tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a
novel method for the measurement of gingival
tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival
unit. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20:366-73
(discussion 374).
18. Murat S, Kamburoglu K, Kiliç C, Ozen T,
Gurbuz A. Nerve damage assessment following
implant placement in human cadaver jaws: an
ex vivo comparative study. J Oral Implantol
2014;40(1):77-83.
19. Juluri R, Moran M, Suzuki JB, Khocht A.
A comparison of computed tomography
scans and digital periapical radiographs
ridge height measurements. J Oral Implantol
2015;41(2):125-31.
20. Hu KS, Choi DY, Lee WJ, Kim HJ, Jung UW, Kim S.
Reliability of two diff erent presurgical prepa-
ration methods for implant Dentistry based
on panoramic radiograph and cone-beam
computed tomography in cadavers. J Perio-
dontal Implant Sci 2012;42:39-44.
21. Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E,
Wenzel A. Comparison of panoramic and
conventional cross-sectional tomography for
preoperative selection of implant size. Clin
Oral Implants Res.
22. Leung CKK, Pow EHN, Li TKL, Lo ECM, Chow
TW. Accuracy of radiographic measurements
for implant planing using cone-beam and
helical computer tomography. J Invest Clin
Dent 2016;0:1-5.
23. Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K,
Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam
and multislice computed tomography depicting
mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
2010;109:25-31.
24. Cassett a M, Stefanelli LV, Pacifi ci A, Pacifi ci L,
Barbato E. How accurate is CBCT in measuring
bone density? A comparative CBCT-CT in
vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
2013;16(4):471-8.
25. Sur J, Seki K, Koizumi H, Nakajima K, Okano T.
Eff ects of tube current on cone-beam compute-
rized tomography image quality for presurgical
implant planing in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:29-33.
26. Kosalagood P, Dip HG, Silkosessak OC,
Pitt ayapat P, Pisarnturakit P, Pauwels R et al.
Linear measurement accuracy of eight cone
bean computed tomography scanners. Clin
Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17(6):1217-27.
27. Kourtis S, Skondra E, Roussou I, Skondras EV.
Presurgical planing in implant restorations:
correct interpretation of cone-beam computed
tomography for improved imaging. J Esthet
Restor Dent 2012;321-34.
28. Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Mesquida J,
Chatriyanuyoke P, Caruso JM. Maxillary central
incisor-incisive canal relationship: a cone beam
computed tomography study. Am J Esthet
Dent 2012;2:180-7.
29. Stumpel LJ. Deformation of stereolithographi-
cally produced surgical guides: an observational
case series report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
2012;14(3):442-53.
30. Park JM, Yi TK, Koak JY, Kim SK, Park EJ, Heo
SJ. Comparison of fi ve-axis milling and rapid
prototyping for implant surgical templates. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(2):374-83.
31. Noharet R, Pett ersson A, Bourgeois D. Accuracy
of implant placement in the posterior maxila
as related to 2 types of surgical guides: a pilot
study in the human cadáver. J Prosthet Dent
2014;112(3):526-32.
32. González-García R, Monje F. Th e reliability of
cone beam computed tomography to assess
bone density at dental implant recipiente sites:
a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT. Clin
Oral Implant Res 2013;24(8):871-9.
33. Gonzalez-Cortes AR, Eimar H, de Sá Barbosa J,
Costa C, Arita ES, Tamimi F. Sensitivity and speci-
fi city of radiographic methods for predicting
insertion torque of dental implants. J Periodontol
2015;86(5):646-55.
34. Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Mumcu E, Özdemir
T. Implant positioning erros in fr eehand and
computer-aided placement methods: a
single-blind clinical comparative study. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(1):190-204.
35. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JYK,
Schutsyser F, Boumans T. Accuracy of
computer-guided surgery: a comparison
of operator experience. J Prosthet Dent
2015;114(3):407-13.
36. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W.
Computer technology applications in surgical
implant Dentistry: a systematic review. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(suppl.):25-42.
37. Scherer MD. Presurgical implant-site asses-
sment and restoratively driven digital planing.
Dent Clin North Am 2014;58:561-95.
38. Scherer MD, Roh HK. Radiopaque dental
impression method for radiographic interpre-
tation, digital alignment, and surgical guide
fabrication for dental implant placement.
J Prosthet Dent 2015;113(4):343-6.