a briar of MacBaren Black Ambrosia therefore removing the need for flame-proof gloves completely. If I promise not to smoke whilst racing, can we agree that my string-backs do not need to comply with this standard?\r\n\r\nShoes, see 8856-2000, section 5.5.1, this standard is rather confusing; “Shoes shall, in use, cover the whole foot and ankle”. If a shoe does NOT cover the whole foot, then it is not a shoe, is it? Then, I refer you to ISO 17493:2000 - Article 7.5 - Procédure B regarding resistance to fire. This lengthy section is clearly written in such a way as to preclude the driver from wearing whiffy old Puma Speedcats, shoes lovingly handstitched in a 3rd world orphanage, but soooo comfortable. Appendix IV-A then requires the footwear to be clearly marked with the manufacturer’s name. Am I really obliged to take a felt-tipped pen to my oxford brogues?\r\n\r\nOuter Garments, see 8856-2000, I had my tailor read your lengthy document in detail and he has come to the conclusion that the FIA doesn’t want drivers wearing anything other than Nomex. Not a natural fibre in sight. I am quite sure that Nomex ticks your many boxes yet am mildly disgusted that a racing driver be expected to clothe himself in a material produced as a by-product of the petrochemical industry.\r\n\r\nMay I respectfully ask you to consider the excellent properties of a thin-weave corduroy as a sartorially-acceptable alternative? Not only is it available in a wide range of pleasing colours, from tepid nutmeg to angry beige, but offers less risk of chafing than Nomex for drivers using the ‘Colin Chapman’ method with regards to undergarments.\r\n\r\nI look forward to your reply, should you wish to discuss this matter in person, I can usually be found in the snug of the Anne of Cleves in Melton Mowbray between the time of 2pm and last orders.\r\n\r\nYours,\r\nMr Boris de Catgune.