Milk Producer April 2016 | Page 24

DFO POLICY CONFERENCE By Sharon Laidlaw, Amy Reusch and Jennifer Nevans [ Editor’s note: Dairy Farmers of Ontario recently held its annual policy conference in Alliston, Ont. Magazine staff filed these reports based on the discussion papers and interviews conducted after the conference. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE Industry stakeholders discuss need to modernize and adapt to new market realities T he world is increasingly moving toward open borders and the Canadian dairy industry must be prepared to respond, says DFO’s chair. “We know the industry must change and adapt to new world realities. We also know we need to have our government officials on side and understanding what we are doing. We want to be in their ears, not their faces,” Ralph Dietrich says at Dairy Farmers of Ontario’s Spring Policy Conference last month. Dietrich told delegates DFO’s board does not believe protesting for greater border control for legally permitted imports will work. “We do not think it is a fight we can win.” Instead, the industry should be pushing hard to modernize, he says, and the way to do this is through the Ontario ingredients program. “DFO’s board fully agrees what is an ingredient at the border should be an ingredient at the processing plant,” he says. Yogurt and cheese standards would limit milk protein isolates use in cheese production, he says, adding cheese standards alone will not address the need to modernize and find markets for domestic ingredients. “Only the ingredients program can and will create an environment for modernizing and investing into domestic ingredients.” Current dairy market conditions need investment because they are no longer sustainable, and therefore, implementing the ingredients program is a race against time, he says. “Time is of the essence. Canadian dryers are approaching the end of their useful life. The Canadian market requires more butterfat, yet the lack of ability to process the associated skim milk solids results in a dynamic that limits the market for domestic milk to meet consumer demand and increases processor reliance on imports. We need all industry stakeholders to realize we do not have time,” Dietrich says. The ingredients program will support growth in butterfat requirements for cream and butter, Dietrich says. Rebuilding butter stocks and growth in the butter market has a direct impact on the size of the structural 24 APRIL 2016 | MILKPRODUCER surplus, says Phil Cairns, DFO senior policy adviser. The strategy’s key objective is to position domestic ingredients so they can be an alternative to imports and reduce the associated structural surplus. “We need to put domestically-produced protein (skim milk) back in Canadian cheese and yogurt products,” Cairns says. Many have tried and are still trying to derail Ontario’s implementation, says Peter Gould, DFO general manager. “There has been tremendous effort to derail the Ontario ingredients program, Gould says. “If people put half as much effort into doing something constructive, we would be twice as far down the road.” DUTY DEFERRAL PROGRAM Another issue facing the industry is the misuse of the Duty Deferral Program (DDP). The program was designed for manufacturing, not agriculture. The challenge for our industry is some importers have used the DDP to import dairy products and other foods, and defer their duty payments for up to four years before they re-export, Dietrich says. This makes it difficult to forecast required milk production each year to ensure the industry meets consumer demand. “It is important Canada’s border measures be enforced to ensure the supply managed system functions properly. The misuse of the Duty Deferral Program to import dairy products is disrupting the management of our system,” he says. Dairy and poultry products have their own specific program called the Import for Re-Export program (IREP). Dietrich noted supply managed products should be excluded from DDP because the IREP program already exists for these goods when importing products for the purpose of re-exporting valued-added food products. MODERNIZATION Gould went on to say DFO did not embark on the ingredients program without first having support from key stakeholders within the province. “We appreciate the support we’ve been given thus far from Ontario stakeholders,” he says. Gould conceded an Ontario only program may not be consistent with the “spirit” of pool or national agreements or even voluntary agreements, but that saving the industry is of “utmost importance.” The real question, he says, is “what happens if we don’t successfully implement an ingredients program?” Time is running out and the industry needs to start the