Military Review English Edition November-December 2013 | Page 107

BOOK REVIEWS often-insular profession of arms. The book’s greatest contribution is that Army officers were the most powerful force in our young nation and that the remoteness of frontier combat shaped the profession of arms in a manner isolated from other social and cultural forces. Conflict on the borders “tempered and confirmed” military bureaucratic changes “setting the tone” ever since for the regular army officer corps. Joseph Miller, Old Town, Maine NATO in AFGHANISTAN The Liberal Disconnect Sten Rynning, Stanford University Press Redwood City, CA, 2012, 288 pages, $25.95 O THER NATO-MEMBER ARMED forces have been in Afghanistan almost as long as the U.S. armed forces have and NATO, as an organization, has been in Afghanistan as the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) lead since 11 August 2003. What has NATO done well, what has it done poorly, and is regional NATO the best organization to settle a conflict in an out-of-region remote locale? Dr. Sten Rynning, who has written extensively about NATO strategic issues, examines these issues and produces a detailed political and diplomatic account of NATO in Afghanistan that is also an examination of NATO’s future. NATO in Afghanistan: The Liberal Disconnect is more a diplomatic and political history than it is a military history. Fighting a war as an alliance is never easy and, despite the dominant roles of the United States and Great Britain, the conduct of the Afghanistan Conflict has been a thorny one for NATO. NATO-liberal governments initially expected that NATO would provide Afghanistan with a benevolent transition to democracy and a thriving economy with little fighting, whereas the ground truth has been a long, hard campaign dominated by military actions, not nationbuilding. Several NATO militaries arrived in Afghanistan prepared to do anything but fight. After initial entry, U.S. action and interest in Afghanistan waned as the bulk of its personnel and material shifted into Iraq. Consequently, NATO’s initial performance was not stellar and the enemy regained MILITARY REVIEW ? November-December 2013 some of its strength, support, and territory. NATO’s performance improved markedly over time and its surge in support of the United States in 2009 proved NATO’s best showing. NATO clearly demonstrated that it was of more long-term value to Afghanistan than the UN and other international organizations. After the significant contributions by NATO nations, will Afghanistan survive and flourish following NATO withdrawal? NATO will survive the Afghanistan Conflict, but will it still be relevant? NATO has now fought two conflicts—a regional one in Kosovo and a nonregional one in Afghanistan. In both, NATO had to first determine whether this was a European or an Atlantic response and whether NATO was still a relevant and responsive geopolitical force or if the European Union could better deal with the issue. Rynning argues that NATO must resume its common purpose as a trans-Atlantic Western alliance promoting Western ideals and interests to remain a positive world actor. There are few books written about NATO in Afghanistan. This is the only one dealing with the strategic level. It is recommended for higher-level staffs and government professionals, but be aware, English is not the author’s primary language and he tends to over-stuff sentences with information. This, coupled with his indirect English sentence structure, means the reader may have to re-reread the same paragraph two or three times to comprehend the meaning. It will take some time to get through, but is worth the effort. Lt. Col. Lester W. Grau, Ph.D., USA, Retired, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas TEACHING AMERICA TO THE WORLD AND THE WORLD TO AMERICA Education and Foreign Relations Si ????????)I??????????????1???)???????????)A??????5???????????9??e??(????????????????????()????????????????????????????????)???????????????????????????Q9?????5??????)??????????????????????????????)????????????????????????????????????????(???((