Measuring market orientation of Muscle Pharm Corp. (MSLP:US) REAL LIFECASE STUDY – REACHING NEW HEIGHTS | Page 8

Reaching new heights - Open source software application SabreSonic® Res.  Use criteria (setup costs, usage costs, and end-user support)  Integration criteria (modularity, collaboration with other projects, compliance with standards, and developer support) We omit scoring in our assessment but use descriptions for each criteria category. Company Company So lution Product Criteria (Maturity, platforms, popularity, design quality) Use Criteria (Set up costs, usage costs, and end-user support) Sabre Holdings SabreSonic Res IBM, Windows,  SAAS  Web-based Market leader  High quality design Low set up costs No additional usage costs Dedicated end-user   support   High set up costs  Low usage costs  Dedicated end-user  support     Amadeus Altea Reservation    Travelport IBS  iPort Departure  and Load Control Suite   iFly Res      Lufthansa NetLine/Sched IBM, Windows,  SAAS  Web-based with  offline capability Major market player High quality design IBM, Windows,  SAAS  N/A  Large market player High quality design IBM, Windows,  SAAS  JEE2 runtime  environment Smaller market player High quality design    Integration Criteria (modularity, collaboration with other projects, standards, and developer support) Native solution currently used across AA group Modular design Native integration Meets standards Developer support Modular design Native integration Meets standards Developer support Open Source/ Proprietary Open Source (Apache) Open Source (Linux) High Set up costs Low usage costs Dedicated end-user support     Modular design Native integration Meets standards Developer support Open Source High set up costs Low usage costs Dedicated end-user support     Systemic design Unknown Meets standards Developer support N/A High set up costs  Medium usage costs  Dedicated end-user  support  Modular design Native integration Meets standards Developer support Proprietary (SAP) Table 1: showing comparison between different OSS Reservation Booking Systems As shown in Table 1, all the reservation software solutions appear to meet similar functional, usage and integration criteria. However, a critical factor for our selection of SabreSonic Res is switching costs. This cost is flagged in the assessment model as “set up costs”, and for organisations as large as airlines, switching costs can be prohibitive. Switching from a native platform like Sabre would involve significant training and implementation costs. Sabre has been used by American Airlines since the 1950s and switching from this operational platform would be prohibitive, especially considering the marginal benefit from using other systems. 7