Leadership magazine Nov/Dec 2017 V47 No. 2 | Page 20

Soft data cuts to the core of our actions A focus on soft data helps school leaders and teachers identify datasets and root causes impeding equity, access and opportunity that are often missed but essential to student achievement. For years, the focus of hard data use in schools has been on test scores. More re- cently, it has come to include other types of disaggregated descriptive statistics that an- swer questions like which students are being referred to the office, which are being sus- pended and expelled, which have access to special programs and classes, and which stu- dents have the most experienced teachers. Inclusion of these datasets allows us to conduct comparative analysis and to acquire a better picture of equity and access. On the other hand, they don’t answer questions about how and why, nor do they unearth root causes impeding student achievement. For that, we turn to soft data. What is soft data Soft data provides information about the interactions between school stakeholders. It’s acquired by observing and talking with students, adults, parents and other school- community members. Soft data is uncovered in a number of places, including, but not limited to, classrooms, staff lounges, front 20 Leadership offices, playgrounds, athletic fields, the hall- ways and corners of the school. Examples include observations in the front office, when students sent there for the same school offense are treated differently; the classroom, when a teacher offers a smile to some students and a grimace to others; and in the staff lounge, when adults speak highly of some students and not so highly of others. Soft data answers questions such as, do noon duty personnel greet stakeholders with a smile and concern, and if so is this same courtesy extended to all or a select few? Similarly, do administrators greet all stake- holders with the same courtesy? If not, who gets what type of treatment? For example, when two parents, enter the office, one well dressed and one not, are they treated equally, not to mention equitably? Do we as teach- ers show deference for select students in our classrooms? Do we push some students to their limits? Do we make eye contact with By Cheryl James-Ward