July/August 2017 | Page 9

G ove r n men t Re lat ions The question that loomed for months on Pennsylvania’s political scene was whether or not the General Assembly and Wolf Administration could agree on a budget for fiscal year 2017-18 by the June 30 deadline. To no great surprise, the answer turned out to be “no.” At the time of publication, the legislature and Governor were still churning out a state budget. Legislators will soon be home until mid-September, which is a perfect time to meet with your senator and representative! Meet with them during PDA’s Legislative Check-Up Week, scheduled for September 11-15. Make an appointment with your lawmakers and we’ll send you all of the background information and talking points you’ll need to discuss the legislation that will impact your profession and patients. Find out more by logging on to PDA’s website at www.padental.org and clicking on Legislative Check-Up Week under the Advocacy tab. Or contact the government relations department at (800) 223-0016 or mss@padental.org. Assignment of Benefits At PDA’s request, Sen. John Eichelberger (R-Blair) and Rep. Stan Saylor (R-York) reintroduced assignment of benefits legislation in the Senate and House. SB 373 and HB 823 would require insurers to honor patients’ request to assign benefits directly to dentists, regardless of whether or not their dentist participates with the insurer. Payment from the insurer to the dentist may not exceed the amount that the insurer would otherwise have paid without the assignment of payment. Without assignment of benefits, patients are forced to pay for the full amount of the dental service upfront – which can be quite cost-prohibitive – or dentists risk performing a service without guarantee of payment. Assignment of benefits remedies this situation for all parties and thus improves access to care. PDA is aggressively lobbying for enactment of assignment of benefits legislation, having spent much of 2016 and the beginning of 2017 working with Senate and House leaders and staff on language that satisfied their concerns about having adequate consumer protection safeguards in place when it comes to the issue of non-participating dentists accepting the assigned benefit and balance billing patients. Stay tuned for more information in upcoming editions of the Pennsylvania Dental Journal. SB 373 has 19 cosponsors and is assigned to the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee. HB 823 has 42 cosponsors and is assigned to the House Insurance Committee. Insurer Credentialing Rep. Matt Baker (R-Bradford, Tioga, Potter) introduced HB 125, which would require health care providers, including dentists, to use the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare credentialing application and for insurers to provide provisional credentialing to eligible applicants if they fail to credential within 30 days of having received the completed form. Supporters for this legislation (including the PA Medical Society, the Hospital and Health System Association of PA, the Coalition of Nurse Practitioners, the PA Academy of Family Physicians and the PA Association of Community Health Centers) contend that physician practices, health centers and other providers regularly face the situation where a newly-hired practitioner cannot be reimbursed by insurers for months because of a cumbersome credentialing process, which often results in the practitioners’ inability to work until they are properly credentialed. HB 125 has 14 cosponsors and was assigned to the House Health Committee, which voted in support in April. The House of Representatives followed suit with a unanimous vote of support in May. HB 125 is now assigned to the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee. Balance Billing Reps. Tina Pickett and Matt Baker introduced HB 1553, legislation aimed at protecting patients from surprise balance bills from medical providers. Surprise balance billing happens when a patient receives medical care from providers and at facilities they believe are in their health insurance plan’s network, but unknowingly receives services from an out-of-network provider. Surprise balance billing can also occur following an emergency, when a consumer has little or no control over where they are taken to receive care, and are often taken to an out-of-network emergency room. The Surprise Balance Bill Protection Act would: • Ensure that consumers are only responsible for their in-network cost-sharing obligations. • Instruct providers to bill insurers directly, while also allowing consumers to trigger protections if they do receive a balance bill. • Instruct insurers to negotiate with providers to determine fair payment for the services that consumers receive. • Establish an independent arbitration process to determine fair payment if the insurer and provider are unable to come to an agreement on the reimbursement. JU LY/AU G U ST 2017 | P EN N SYLVAN IA DEN TAL JOURNAL 7