Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-8 | Page 56

592 P. Enthoven et al. with (all) χ 2 (9)=64.309, p < 0.001, SRMR = 0.027, (WAD) χ 2 (9)=16.856, p = 0.051, SRMR = 0.031, (CR) χ 2 (9)=42.002, p < 0.001, SRMR = 0.038, and (MixCP) χ 2 (9)=37.057, p < 0.001, SRMR = 0.038, respectively (Table V). Furthermore, all standardized residual cor- relations were small (< 0.10). However, in the WAD group 1 residual correlation was at 0.12 and in the MixCP group 1 residual correlation was at 0.10, but can be considered small. Standardized factor pattern loadings ranged from 0.706 to 0.932. Table V. Confirmatory factor analysis, including all items of the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) for all groups All WAD CR MixCP (n  = 516) (n  = 116) (n  = 115) (n  = 285) Factor 1 Factor 1 Factor 1 Factor 1 χ 2 test of model fit Degrees of freedom (df) p-value SRMR 64.309 (9) < 0.001 0.027 Residual correlations Standardized factor loadings PEI1, able to cope with life PEI2, able to understand your illness PEI3, able to cope with your illness PEI4, able to keep yourself healthy PEI5, confident about your health PEI6, able to help yourself < 0.1 < 0.1 a < 0.1 < 0.1 b 0.870 0.788 0.916 0.880 0.895 0.882 0.813 0.706 0.924 0.804 0.907 0.927 0.889 0.855 0.932 0.905 0.927 0.907 0.892 0.752 0.879 0.891 0.821 0.882 16.856 (9) 0.051 0.031 42.002 (9) < 0.001 0.038 37.057 (9) < 0.001 0.038 Internal consistency. For all participants the PEI (n = 516) had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.907. In the WAD, the CR and the MixCP group the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.890, 0.929 and 0.878, respectively. a Residual correlation PEI2 – PEI4 = 0.128, b residual correlation PEI3 – PEI5 = 0.100. WAD: whiplash-associated disorders; CR: cervical radiculopathy; MixCP: mixed chronic pain; SRMR: standardized root mean square residual. Correlations between Patient Enablement Instrument and other measures 2 “able to understand your illness” (CR group, 8%, n = 11) and question 6 “able to help yourself” (MixCP group, 1.9%, n = 6), respectively. For all participants the correlations between PEI score and health (EQ-5D Index and EQ VAS) after treatment were moderate (r Sp  = 0.507–0.581, Table VI). For the CR group the correlation between the PEI score and Construct validity. Results showed the 1-factor PEI model had approximate fit to the data for all 4 groups, Table VI. Correlations between the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) score after treatment with self-reported health after treatment and changes from baseline to after treatment Patient Enablement Instrument Variables Baseline Age, years Sex (men, women) BMI Country of birth (Sweden, Scandinavian country outside Sweden, non-Scandinavian country) Level of education (Compulsory, High school, University/college) Living alone (yes, no) Disability (NDI or FRI) After treatment Change from baseline to after treatment Anxiety (HADS) After treatment Change from baseline to after treatment Depression (HADS) After treatment Change from baseline to after treatment PCS After treatment Change from baseline to after treatment SES After treatment Change from baseline to after treatment CSQ Catastrophizing After treatment Change from baseline to after treatment EQ-5D index After treatment Change from baseline to after treatment EQ VAS After treatment Change from baseline to after treatment Self-reported current work ability After treatment (n  = 103, 275) Change from baseline to after Treatment (n  = 93; 273) All (n  = 485–504) WAD (n  = 113–116) CR (n  = 108–115) MixCP (n  = 262–276) r Sp r Sp r Sp p-value 0.037 –0.012 –0.070 p-value r Sp p-value 0.413 0.790 0.790 0.126 0.108 0.035 0.177 0.247 0.713 –0.082 0.035 –0.162 0.464 0.690 0.064 – – –0.053 – – 0.627 0.069 0.039 –0.172 p-value 0.383 0.712 0.087 0.016 0.090 –0.054 0.795 0.135 0.382 0.574 –0.103 0.099 0.062 0.090 0.100 0.304 – – –0.022 – – – – – – –0.387 –0.452 < 0.001 < 0.001 –0.579 –0.554 < 0.001 < 0.001 –0.383 –0.274 < 0.001 < 0.001 – – – – – – – – – – – – –0.276 –0.286 < 0.001 < 0.001 – – – – – – – – – – – – –0.335 –0.293 < 0.001 < 0.001 – – – – –0.332 –0.353 < 0.001 < 0.001 – – – – – – – – – – – – 0.250 0.260 0.008 0.005 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 0.552 0.388 < 0.001 < 0.001 – – – - 0.505 –0.248 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.252 0.137 0.007 0.065 0.543 0.209 < 0.001 0.030 0.432 0.200 < 0.001 0.001 0.576 0.490 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.403 0.297 < 0.001 0.001 0.618 0.494 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.530 0.384 < 0.001 < 0.001 – – 0.201 0.201 0.040 0.053 – – 0.356 0.167 < 0.001 0.006 – – – – – – WAD: whiplash-associated disorders; CR: cervical radiculopathy; MixCP: mixed chronic pain; NDI: Neck Disability Index; FRI: Functional Rating Index; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; EQ-5D: European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions; VAS: visual analogue scale; rSp: Spearman’s rho. www.medicaljournals.se/jrm