Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-8 | Page 43

Prevalence of osteoarthritis among adults with cerebral palsy forms of CP. To support this notion, in a previous study leveraging the same database and of the same year, the prevalence of comorbid neurodevelopmental disa- bilities (i.e. intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorders) for adults with CP was lower than expected (24). The presence of comorbid neurodevelopmental disabilities increases the medical needs and complexity of CP (25). Therefore, prevalence estimates are proba- bly conservative, leading to more modest effect sizes reported in this study. Nevertheless, the findings have important implications for public health. The burden of OA, represented as disability-adjusted life years, has substantially increased over recent decades (4). By 2032, predictions have estimated an additional 26,000 per million adults > 44 years of age will utilize healthcare services for OA compared with 2012 (26). The adult population with CP is projected to expand over the coming decades (27, 28), and given their early OA profile, this may lead to a disproportionate increase in the disease and economic burden of OA attributable to CP. Many factors may contribute to the early develop- ment of OA for adults with CP, some of which may originate in childhood. The aetiology of CP leads to altered neuromuscular control and gait mechanics (29), low levels of physical activity (8), and a predisposition for inadequate accrual of muscle and bone (8) throug- hout growth and development. There are also a number of skeletal deformities, malalignments, and problems of the lower extremities present among individuals with CP (30–32), such as greater femoral anteversion, hip subluxation and joint dislocation. The motor fun- ction and musculoskeletal pathological phenotype in childhood is confounded by several CP-related factors (33), including the type of CP (e.g. spastic, dyskinetic, ataxic), the anatomical distribution of affected areas (e.g. hemiplegia, diplegia, quadriplegia), and the level of gross motor functional ability (e.g. independent ambulation, use of assistive walking devices or wheel- chair). Furthermore, the degree to which muscles are affected (e.g. severity), how they are affected (e.g. spasticity) and the number of affected muscles plays a large, interactive role on joint health by altering articular surface stresses incurred during movement; all of which may lead to localized joint damage and increased risk for OA. The health and functional problems experienced in childhood increase in severity as these individuals age into their adult years (34, 35). In the first stage of adulthood, 18–30-year-olds with CP have a similar musculoskeletal disease prevalence as the general population of adults ≥ 50 years of age (36), which be- comes more prevalent throughout their lifespan (10). Taken together, long-term altered mechanical loading 579 patterns and insufficient musculoskeletal integrity, fun- ction, and structure, especially of regions surrounding lower extremity joints, may impose additive risk for early development of OA (11, 12). It is also important to note that OA is implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic diseases (37) and mental health disorders (38) among adults without CP. Adults with CP have elevated cardiometabolic disease prevalence (9), higher incidence of depression and anx- iety (39), and 2–3-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (40) compared with adults without CP. While it is unknown how OA associates with non-commu- nicable diseases and mortality among adults with CP, OA has been shown to amplify daily pain levels and negatively affect function and activities of daily living for adults without CP (1). The association of OA with mental health disorders may affect adults with CP to a greater extent than adults without CP, possibly through pathways of lower societal integration at earlier ages. Studies are needed to determine if physical activity- based interventions can slow the onset of OA or reduce the worsening of OA progression for adults with CP, which may also have a positive impact on reducing the burden of other non-communicable diseases. This study has several limitations. First, it was not possible to determine the severity of CP using administrative claims data. However, the overall CP sample may reflect a healthier and higher functioning segment of the CP population, thus biasing results to be more conservative. Furthermore, the prevalence of CP in this privately insured cohort of adults was 0.84 per 1,000, which is lower than the previously reported 3.1 per 1,000 in children (41); however, no adequately designed or powered epidemiological studies have examined the prevalence of CP among adults. Secondly, we used a single claim to define CP and OA. Previous validation studies have shown that using 2 or more claims for a medical condition tends to improve the accurate identification of that medical condition (17, 42). However, accurately identifying medical conditions depends on the number of years for the study period (43) and the medical condition exa- mined (17, 43, 44). Given the short study period of 12 months, requiring 2 or more claims for OA may have introduced disproportionate risk of biasing estimates to be lower from patients without CP. Adults with CP have complex healthcare needs and are more likely to utilize healthcare resources, which would provide more opportunities to be “flagged” for OA. Taken together, the selected methodology to identify OA is probably sufficient to reasonably detect that the cur- rent data is evidence of differences in OA prevalence across groups. Thirdly, administrative claims data are subject to errors, such as inaccurate coding of medical J Rehabil Med 51, 2019