Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 51-6 | Page 4

398 S. Gordon et al. Most HAD research has focused on older people (1–4). Falvey et al. described HAD as “declines in muscle strength, muscle mass, cognitive function, muscle protein synthesis and physical function” (2, p. 1307), while van Vliet & Deeg describe it in terms of loss of mobility (stairs, footpaths) and inability to undertake activities of daily living (such as sit-to-stand, moving around, and cutting toenails) (4). Creditor described 8 hazards of hospitalization (including bed rest or enforced immobilization) as: decline in muscle strength and aerobic capacity; vasomotor instability; reduced bone density; reduced pulmonary ventilation; altered sensory “continence”, appetite and thirst; and urinary incontinence (12). Compared with other aut- hors in the field, Creditor reports the broadest range of HAD attributes, and these were used to benchmark the assessment items identified in this evidence scan (12). HAD elements overlap those described for frailty. Like HAD, frailty is also variably described in the literature by characteristics such as decreased muscle strength; fatigue; compromised ambulation, conti- nence, nutrition, sleep patterns and/or energy levels; heightened anxiety and/or depression; unexplained persistent pain; and/or decreased confidence in safely undertaking usual daily activities (1–7, 12). The main difference between HAD and frailty appears to be the time-frame within which change is detected. HAD can manifest within hours of hospitalization requiring bed rest or immobility (1, 2, 4, 6), whilst frailty is gene- rally more insidious, taking longer for subtle age- or disease-related changes to functioning to manifest (1, 5). Thus, the challenge of identifying HAD is ensuring the repeated, judicious application of measures that can efficiently demonstrate change within days of hospitalization. The term “body systems performance” is used in this paper as an overarching term for a range of factors addressed in the International Classification of Fun- ctioning, Disability and Health (ICF), including body functions and structures (such as weight, nutritional status, cardiopulmonary condition, muscle strength, skin integrity) and functional capacities (such as ba- lance, transfers, walking ability, self-care) (13). There are increasing pressures on acute hospital beds worldwide, particularly given increases in the preva- lence of chronic disease and the proportion of people living for longer (2, 8–10). Safe, efficient and effective discharge from hospital to home makes economic and social sense (1, 2, 10, 12, 14, 15). Preventing HAD is essential for safe, efficient discharge, and to prevent readmission (1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 14). Therefore, being alert to, and assessing for, incipient HAD should be within the remit of any health professional (14, 16). Howe- ver, there is no comprehensive agreed assessment for www.medicaljournals.se/jrm HAD that can be applied repeatedly during an acute hospital admission (1–3, 5, 7, 8, 11–15). To be relevant to an acute hospital admission, HAD assessment items need to be measured at point-in-time (P-i-T) (or over very short time-frames), so that incipient HAD can be identified within days of admission. To date, inpatient assessments of body system performance are often inconsistently conducted by different healthcare professionals, using different as- sessment instruments, which assess different aspects of body system performance over different time-periods (2, 4, 12, 14–16). Moreover, findings are variably recorded and shared, which constrains proactivity in preventing HAD (11, 14–16). This largely reflects the primary focus of acute hospitals, which is to resolve the reason(s) for admission, rather than to prevent un- suspected and adjunctive issues, such as HAD (14–16). As a result, HAD may not be recognized until it has become a risk to successful discharge. Hospital quality standards and bed flow would be significantly enhan- ced if regular application of core standard assessment items for HAD occurred throughout the acute hospital stay (1–3, 8–10, 14, 15). This paper describes research to fill a current gap in clinical assessment practices for HAD in acute hospital settings. METHODS Objectives To systematically identify literature reporting on assessment instruments relevant for incipient HAD during acute hospital admissions; evaluate their psychometric properties; and identify individual assessment items to form the basis of a comprehen- sive, acute hospital test battery for HAD. Research hypothesis There is no standard, comprehensive instrument currently available to assess acute hospital inpatients for all elements of incipient HAD. Research outcome Identification of items from one or more psychometrically-sound assessment instruments, to form the basis for comprehensive testing of body systems performance to detect incipient HAD during an acute hospital admission. Study process Papers that described psychometric properties of assessment instruments for any element of HAD were systematically identified. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of these instruments were then critiqued using a validated checklist (17); and assessment items relevant to a comprehensive test battery for incipient HAD identified. The items must be able to be repeatedly and efficiently applied and recorded by any healthcare provider in acute hospital settings.