Activity levels during inpatient stroke rehabilitation
mendations for stroke survivors: a statement for health-
care professionals from the American Heart Association/
American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014; 45: 2532–2553.
2. Sjoholm A, Skarin M, Churilov L, Nilsson M, Bernhardt J,
Linden T. Sedentary behaviour and physical activity of
people with stroke in rehabilitation hospitals. Stroke Res
Treat 2014; 2014: 591897.
3. Bernhardt J, Chitravas N, Meslo IL, Thrift AG, Indredavik B.
Not all stroke units are the same: a comparison of physical
activity patterns in Melbourne, Australia, and Trondheim,
Norway. Stroke 2008; 39: 2059–2065.
4. Askim T, Bernhardt J, Loge AD, Indredavik B. Stroke pa-
tients do not need to be inactive in the first two-weeks
after stroke: results from a stroke unit focused on early
rehabilitation. Int J Stroke 2012; 7: 25–31.
5. Bernhardt J, Dewey H, Thrift A, Donnan G. Inactive and
alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute
stroke unit care. Stroke 2004; 35: 1005–1009.
6. West T, Bernhardt J. Physical activity in hospitalised stroke
patients. Stroke Res Treat 2012; 2012: 813765.
7. Lacroix J, Daviet JC, Borel B, Kammoun B, Salle JY, Mandi-
gout S. Physical activity level among stroke patients hos-
pitalized in a rehabilitation unit. PM & R 2016; 8: 97–104.
8. Paul L, Brewster S, Wyke S, Gill JM, Alexander G, Dybus
A, et al. Physical activity profiles and sedentary behaviour
in people following stroke: a cross-sectional study. Disabil
Rehabil 2016; 38: 362–367.
9. Tieges Z, Mead G, Allerhand M, Duncan F, van Wijck F,
Fitzsimons C, et al. Sedentary behavior in the first year
after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study with objective
measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96: 15–23.
10. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW. Upper
extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few
weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2007; 31: 56–63.
11. Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, Simek J, Bernhardt J. How
is physical activity monitored in people following stroke?
Disabil Rehabil 2015; 37: 1717–1731.
12. Noorkoiv M, Rodgers H, Price CI. Accelerometer mea-
surement of upper extremity movement after stroke: a
systematic review of clinical studies. J Neuroeng Rehabil
2014; 11: 144.
13. Vaha-Ypya H, Vasankari T, Husu P, Suni J, Sievanen H. A
universal, accurate intensity-based classification of dif-
ferent physical activities using raw data of accelerometer.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2015; 35: 64–70.
14. Butte NF, Ekelund U, Westerterp KR. Assessing physical
activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical
activity. Med Sci Sports Exercise 2012; 44: S5–S12.
15. Rosbergen ICM, Brauer SG, Fitzhenry S, Grimley RS, Hay-
ward KS. Qualitative investigation of the perceptions and
experiences of nursing and allied health professionals invol-
ved in the implementation of an enriched environment in an
Australian acute stroke unit. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e018226.
16. Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, McElduff P, Pollack M, Nils-
son M, et al. An enriched environment increases activity
in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in a mixed
rehabilitation unit: a pilot non-randomized controlled trial.
Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36: 255–262.
17. Tinlin L, Fini N, Bernhardt J, Lewis LK, Olds T, English C.
Best practice guidelines for the measurement of physical
activity levels in stroke survivors: a secondary analysis of
an observational study. Int J Rehabil Res 2018; 41: 14–19.
18. Alt Murphy M, Andersson S, Danielsson A, Ohlsson F, Wi-
penmyr J. Acceleration based activity levels during suba-
cute inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Procedia Technology
2017; 27: 120–121.
19. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind
S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for
evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med
1975; 7: 13–31.
20. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-
Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following ce-
rebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983; 63: 1606–1610.
433
21. Crow JL, Harmeling-van der Wel BC. Hierarchical properties
of the motor function sections of the Fugl-Meyer assess-
ment scale for people after stroke: a retrospective study.
Phys Ther 2008; 88: 1554–1567.
22. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modi-
fied Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;
67: 206–207.
23. Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M.
Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional
ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 1314–1319.
24. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for
neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome
assessment. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1530–1539.
25. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide
to data analysis using IBM SPSS. 5th ed. Maidenhead:
McGraw-Hill; 2013. xiv, p. 354.
26. De Wit L, Putman K, Dejaeger E, Baert I, Berman P, Bogae-
rts K, et al. Use of time by stroke patients: a comparison
of four European rehabilitation centers. Stroke 2005; 36:
1977–1983.
27. Mackey F, Ada L, Heard R, Adams R. Stroke rehabilitation:
are highly structured units more conducive to physical
activity than less structured units? Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1996; 77: 1066–1070.
28. Simpson DB, Breslin M, Cumming T, de Zoete S, Gall SL,
Scmidt M, et al. Go home, sit less: the impact of home versus
hospital rehabilitation environment on activity levels of stroke
survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018: 99; 2216–2221.
29. Davis MG, Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Sharp DJ, Coulson JC,
Thompson JL. Objectively measured physical activity in a
diverse sample of older urban UK adults. Med Sci Sports
Exer 2011; 43: 647–654.
30. Smith L, Hamer M, Ucci M, Marmot A, Gardner B, Sawyer
A, et al. Weekday and weekend patterns of objectively
measured sitting, standing, and stepping in a sample of
office-based workers: the active buildings study. BMC
Public Health 2015; 15: 9.
31. Nicolai S, Benzinger P, Skelton DA, Aminian K, Becker C,
Lindemann U. Day-to-day variability of physical activity
of older adults living in the community. J Aging Phys Act
2010; 18: 75–86.
32. Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang PF, Jeng JS, Hung C. How active
are people with stroke?: use of accelerometers to assess
physical activity. Stroke 2009; 40: 163–168.
33. Ada L, Mackey F, Heard R, Adams R. Stroke rehabilitation:
does the therapy area provide a physical challenge? Aust
J Physiother 1999; 45: 33–38.
34. Mansfield A, Brooks D, Tang A, Taylor D, Inness EL, Kiss A, et
al. Promoting Optimal Physical Exercise for Life (PROPEL):
aerobic exercise and self-management early after stroke to
increase daily physical activity-study protocol for a stepped-
wedge randomised trial. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e015843.
35. Dobkin BH. A rehabilitation-internet-of-things in the home
to augment motor skills and exercise training. Neurorehabil
Neural Repair 2017; 31: 217–227.
36. Askim T, Bernhardt J, Churilov L, Fredriksen KR, Indredavik
B. Changes in physical activity and related functional and
disability levels in the first six months after stroke: a longi-
tudinal follow-up study. J Rehabil Med 2013; 45: 423–428.
37. Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L,
Wolf SL. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world
arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence
from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation
trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1340–1345.
38. Johansson D, Malmgren K, Alt Murphy M. Wearable sensors
for clinical applications in epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease,
and stroke: a mixed-methods systematic review. J Neurol
2018: 265; 1740–1742.
39. Lynch EA, Jones TM, Simpson DB, Fini NA, Kuys SS, Borsch-
mann K, et al. Activity monitors for increasing physical
activity in adult stroke survivors. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2018; 7: CD012543.
J Rehabil Med 51, 2019