58
J. Eur. Opt. Society-Rapid Publ. 22, 6( 2026)
20 Chen P et al., Vertical distribution of subsurface phytoplankton layer in South China Sea using airborne lidar, Remote Sens. Environ. 263, 112567( 2021). https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / j. rse. 2021.112567.
21 Liu H et al., Subsurface plankton layers observed from airborne lidar in Sanya Bay, South China Sea, Opt. Express 26, 29134 – 29147( 2018). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 26.029134.
22 Schulien JA et al., Vertically-resolved phytoplankton carbon and net primary production from a high spectral resolution lidar, Opt. Express 25( 12), 13577 – 13587( 2017). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 25.013577.
23 Chen W et al., Review of airborne oceanic lidar remote sensing, Intell. Mar. Technol. Syst. 1( 1), 10( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1007 / s44295-023-00007-y.
24 Churnside JH et al., Airborne lidar for fisheries applications, Opt. Eng. 40( 3), 406 – 414( 2001). https:// doi. org / 10.1117 / 1.1348000.
25 Roddewig MR et al., Dual-polarization airborne lidar for freshwater fisheries management and research, Opt. Eng. 56( 3), 031221( 2017). https:// doi. org / 10.1117 / 1. OE. 56.3.031221.
26 Scofeld TP et al., Applying Gaussian mixture models to detect fish from airborne lidar measurements, in Proc. IEEE Res. Appl. Photon. Def. Conf.( RAPID), Miramar Beach( 2021). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / RAPID51799.2021.9521457.
27 Churnside JH et al., Surveying the distribution and abundance of flying fishes and other epipelagic in the northern Gulf of Mexico using airborne lidar, Bull. Mar. Sci. 93( 2), 591 – 609( 2016). https:// doi. org / 10.5343 / bms. 2016.1039.
28 Churnside JH et al., Ocean backscatter profiling using highspectral-resolution lidar and a perturbation retrieval, Remote Sens. 10( 12), 2003( 2018). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / rs10122003.
29 Liu Q et al., Shipborne variable-FOV, dual-wavelength, polarized ocean lidar: design and measurements in the Western Pacific, Opt. Express 30, 8927( 2022). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 449554.
30 Li K et al., A dual-wavelength ocean lidar for vertical profiling of oceanic backscatter and attenuation, Remote Sens. 12, 2844( 2020). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / rs12172844.
31 Chen P et al., LiDAR remote sensing for vertical distribution of seawater optical properties and chlorophyll-a from the East China Sea to the South China Sea, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1 – 21( 2022). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / TGRS. 2022.3174230.
32 Lee JH et al., Oceanographic lidar profiles compared with estimates from in situ optical measurements, Appl. Opt. 52( 4), 786 – 794( 2013). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / AO. 52.000786.
33 Zhang L et al., An experimental study on monitoring wave profiles with lidar, Ocean Eng. 285, 115436( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / j. oceaneng. 2023.115436.
34 Wang D et al., An experimental study on measuring breaking-wave bubbles with lidar remote sensing, Remote Sens. 14( 7), 12( 2022). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / rs14071680.
35 Churnside JH et al., Airborne lidar detection and characterization of internal waves in a shallow fjord, J. Appl. Remote Sens. 6, 063611( 2012). https:// doi. org / 10.1117 / 1. JRS. 6. 063611.
36 Dolin LS et al., Algorithms for determining the spectralenergy characteristics of a random field of internal waves from fluctuations of lidar echo signals, Appl. Opt. 59( 10), C78 – C86( 2020). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / AO. 381675.
37 Maccarone A et al., Three-dimensional imaging of stationary and moving targets in turbid underwater environments using a single-photon detector array, Opt. Express 27( 20), 28437 – 28456( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 27.028437.
38 Maccarone A et al., Submerged single-photon lidar imaging sensor used for real-time 3D scene reconstruction in scattering underwater environments, Opt. Express 31( 10), 19( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 487129.
39 Shangguan M et al., Compact underwater single-photon imaging lidar, Opt. Lett. 50( 6), 1957 – 1960( 2025). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OL. 557195.
40 Yang E et al., SHOALS object detection, Int. Hydrogr. Rev. 24 – 36( 2010).
41 Wang D et al., Evaluation of a new lightweight UAV-borne topo-bathymetric lidar for shallow water bathymetry and object detection, Sensors 22( 4), 1379( 2022). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / s22041379.
42 Zhang Z et al., SOLS: An open-source spaceborne oceanic lidar simulator, Remote Sens. 14, 1849( 2022). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / rs14081849.
43 Churnside JH, Review of profiling oceanographic lidar, Opt. Eng. 53, 051405( 2013). https:// doi. org / 10.1117 / 1. OE. 53.5. 051405.
44 Zhou Y et al., Validation of the analytical model of oceanic lidar returns: Comparisons with Monte Carlo simulations and experimental results, Remote Sens. 11, 1870( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / rs11161870.
45 Liao Y et al., GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo simulation for a single-photon underwater lidar, Remote Sens. 15, 5245( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / rs15215245.
46 Poole LR et al., Semianalytic Monte Carlo radiative transfer model for oceanographic lidar systems, Appl. Opt. 20, 3653 – 3663( 1981). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / AO. 20. 003653.
47 Liu Q et al., A semianalytic Monte Carlo simulator for spaceborne oceanic lidar: Framework and preliminary results, Remote Sens. 12, 2820( 2020). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / rs12172820.
48 Stegmann PG et al., Study of the effects of phytoplankton morphology and vertical profile on lidar attenuated backscatter and depolarization ratio, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 225, 1 – 15( 2019). https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / j. jqsrt. 2018.12.009.
49 He H et al., Validation of the polarized Monte Carlo model of shipborne oceanic lidar returns, Opt. Express 31, 43250( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 511445.
50 Cui X et al., Influence of wind-roughed sea surface on detection performance of spaceborne oceanic lidar, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 297, 108481( 2023). https:// doi. org / 10.1016 / j. jqsrt. 2022.108481.
51 Chen P et al., OLE: A novel oceanic lidar emulator, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 59, 9730 – 9744( 2021). https:// doi. org / 10.1109 / TGRS. 2020.3035381.
52 Chen P et al., Semi-analytic Monte Carlo model for oceanographic lidar systems: Lookup table method used for randomly choosing scattering angles, Appl. Sci. 9, 48( 2018). https:// doi. org / 10.3390 / app9010048.
53 Wang CK et al., A Monte Carlo study of the seagrassinduced depth bias in bathymetric lidar, Opt. Express 19, 7230( 2011). https:// doi. org / 10.1364 / OE. 19.007230.