JADE Student Edition 2019 JADE JSLUG 2019 | Page 88

in the year 2002 that established the ICC. It allows the court complimentary jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression. In contrast to previous multi-lateral treaties the ICC takes the concept of universal jurisdiction and applies it broadly. The court is set up with legal coercion that the state parties have agreed to. The ICC was established in wake of the Nuremberg trial and the Tokyo tribunal, these tribunals are significant in the imperialistic nature. As a result, multilateral institutions are premised on western liberal democratic values. Selective Enforcement When considering the permanent members of the (UNSC) it is noteworthy that the USA, Russia and China are not parties to the Rome statute. Whereas Africa is the most heavily represented region in the Court’s membership, the majority of the ICC’s investigations compromise of crimes committed in African countries. In term of Galtung’s theory the Centre nation provides decision models and the Periphery provides obedience. It could be argued that the threat of individual prosecution is the reason for their reluctancy towards the organisation. Role of the United Nation Security Council (UNSC) Atrocities committed against third world countries are often referred to the UN Security Council. However permanent members of the UNSC possess the power to veto these cases. The option to veto a case becomes a mechanism of political control whereby the veto power is misused to help maintain alliances between countries in order protect strategic interests of the permanent members. There have been cases whereby these interests have been protected at the expense of humanitarian intervention 88  The UN The UN peacekeeping troops are responsible for providing humanitarian assistance whereby governments have committed atrocities towards their own citizens. The Srebrenica genocide of July 1995 historically was one of the most significant miscarriages of justice within international law in Europe subsequent to the war period (Ryngaert and Schrijver, 2015) and. The UN Protection Force (UNPROFOR) has been under criticism for failing to prevent this atrocity despite a military battalion being based near the Bosnian town. Serbian troops committed genocide against Muslims of Bosnia. The international response to the civil war in Darfur was also considered a failure on behalf of the UN. During 2001-2003 Arab Militias engaged in ethnic cleansing and genocide against indigenous population were supported by the Sudanese government (De Waal, 2007). Again this was a miscarriage of justice on behalf of the UN due to the late deployed UN African Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) which caused the atrocity to continue. The War on Terror War crimes are breaches of the Geneva Conventions and other violation of the laws applicable to international armed conflict. The USA was under scrutiny by the ICC for intentionally directing attacks against civilians in Iraq. Fatou Bensouda was denied visa into the USA (Drury, 2019) as it was revoked by Washington. Historically he US had a major objection during its establishment in 2002, The US argue that the court undermines national sovereignty. Donald Trump: ‘The ICC has no legitimacy, jurisdiction or authority’. Conclusion Disbanding these international organisations is not a realistic or viable solution as there are no other mechanisms that are equal, partially because