International Core Journal of Engineering 2020-26 | Page 70

Fig. 4. Process of counting vouchers and electronic votes.
Fig. 4 explains how the counting of votes works at the
moment of receiving them physically and electronically and
the comparison that is made at the end to verify that the votes
were processed satisfactorily.
A CKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors thanks to Universidad Politécnica Salesiana
del Ecuador, to the research group of the Guayaquil
Headquarters “Computing, Security and Information
Technology for a Globalized World” (CSITGW) created
according to resolution 142-06-2017-07-19 and Secretaría de
Educación Superior Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
(Senescyt).
IV. D ISCUSSION
The main result of Smartmatic is the robustness of its
equipment and its function of printing a voucher that helps to
make a comparison between electronic and physical voting.
What is missing in society is to have is to know the new trends
that will help people to have a new system that facilitates the
counting of votes. A comparison with the other systems
mentioned above is that they use different types of securities
to be able to keep their votes fully integrated. The biggest
consequence would be that there are people who want to
manipulate and extort votes already stored in a main server.
R EFERENCES
[1]
Z. A. Saputri, A. Sudarsono, M. Yuliana, “E-voting security system for
the election of EEPIS BEM president”, Proc. - Int. Electron. Symp.
Knowl. Creat. Intell. Comput. IES-KCIC 2017, vol. 2017–Janua, pp.
147–152, 2017,.
[2] M. F. M. Mursi, G. M. R. Assassa, A. A. Abdelhafez, K. M. Abosamra,
“A Secure and Auditable Cryptographic-Based e-Voting Scheme”,
Proc. - 2015 2nd Int. Conf. Math. Comput. Sci. Ind. MCSI 2015, pp.
253–262, 2016.
[3] M. Bishop, S. Peisert, “Security and elections”, IEEE Secur. Priv., vol.
10, no. 5, pp. 64–67, 2012.
[4] N. G. Tsoutsos, M. Maniatakos, “Cryptographic vote-stealing attacks
against a partially homomorphic e-voting architecture”. Proc. 34th
IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Des. ICCD 2016, pp. 157–160, 2016.
[5] R. M. Alvarez, G. Katz, J. Pomares, “The impact of new technologies
on voter confidence in Latin America: Evidence from e-voting
experiments in Argentina and Colombia”. J. Inf. Technol. Polit., vol. 8,
no. 2, pp. 199–217, 2011.
[6] L. F. Cranor, R. K. Cytron, “Sensus: a security-conscious electronic
polling system for the Internet”, Syst. Sci. 1997, Proc. Thirtieth Hawaii
Int. Conf., 3, pp. 561–570, 1997.
[7] M. H. Sedky, E. M. R. Hamed, “A secure e-Government’s e-voting
system”, Proc. 2015 Sci. Inf. Conf. SAI 2015, pp. 1365–1373, 2015.
[8] A. R. Kenari, J. Hosseinkhani, M. Shamsi, M. Harouni, () A robust and
high speed E-voting algorithm using ElGammel CryptoSystem. 2010
2nd Int. Conf. Comput. Autom. Eng. ICCAE 2010, 5, pp. 812–816,
2010.
[9] G. E. G. Beroggi, “Secure and easy internet voting,” Computer (Long.
Beach. Calif), vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 52–56, 2008.
[10] S. Ibrahim, M. Kamat, M. Salleh, S. R. A. Aziz, “Secure E-voting with
blind signature”, 4th Natl. Conf. Telecommun. Technol. NCTT 2003 -
V. F UTURE W ORKS AND C ONCLUSIONS
The agency in charge of a country's electoral elections
envisaged the application of any alternative for the assurance
of the integrity of the electoral data; you must define the
processes using different techniques as conceptual models.
Electronic votes show a high level of trust, although this
depends on the age and education of the voter who must have
some knowledge in the field of information technology,
especially in current technology, this refers to the elderly in
many cases they do not feel the comfort and adequate
confidence. By using the Smartmatic system in our society,
the processes of democracy will be improved, giving the
Ecuadorian people adequate confidence. This increase in
democracy and the correct election of a leader by means of
voting will boost the economic and industrial growth of the
country. This system can be an alternative to implement
electronic voting in Ecuador; once the processes for the
application of Smartmatic operation have been defined.
48