International Core Journal of Engineering 2020-26 | Page 37

O a O a L , O a M , O a U (4) Establish risk factor matrix IV. R ANKING OF RISK FACTORS MATRIX BASED ON Sort elements of each factor layers TRIANGULAR FUZZY NUMBERS A. Risk factor AHP model Risk factor AHP model classifies different risk factors on the basis of risk identification to form different levels. Among them, the power market settlement belongs to the target layer, that is, the indicator that need to be sorted by risk. The severity when the risk occurs, the recovery speed after the risk occurs, the frequency of the risk, and whether the risk is easily detected, which are the criterion layer, that is, the assessment of the various possibilities of risk. The specific risks that may arise are the factor layer, which are the data risk, credit risk, tax risk and policy risk involved in risk identification. The power market settlement risk factor AHP model is shown in Figure 2 [8] . Use fuzzy operator to calculate weighted average of each layers Calculate the risk factor deviation degree Normalize and sort the deviation degree Fig.3. Figure for sequencing of risk factor ķ First, the matrix A ( a ij j ) n composed of limited risk factors is established, according to the AHP model of settlement risk factors in power market and the tab.1 Settlement of Competitive electricity market Severity Recovery speed ĸ Secondly, the average value of each row element Monitoring difficulty Frequency a ij O is calculated in the risk matrix and b i ik has been proposed according to the rank of average value from large to small. Data risk Credit risk Tax risk Policy risk Fig. 2. AHP model for power market settlement risk a ij O B. Determination of risk factor matrix based on triangular fuzzy numbers A risk factor matrix is constructed based on the power yp market settlement risk factor AHP model. Hypothetically matrix A ( a ij j ) n is a matrix of risk factors, a ij a ij L , a ij M , a ij U is a Where, O is the attitude of decision makers. O O usually taken in industrial production. If a ij 0.5 is O a il ,the a ij O and a il O . Ĺ Next, the weight vector Z T Z 1 , Z 2 , Z n is determined. The value of Z j can be determined by Equation (6). assessment and a ij U is the most optimistic assessment. M ij (5) average value is obtained to be b i ik is the average values of fuzzy number formed by the factor layer for the comparison of the two important degrees of the criterion layer. Where, a ij L is the most pessimistic assessment. a ij M is the most likely L ij 1 ª 1  O a ij L  a ij M  O a ij U º ¼ , 0 d O d 1 2 ¬ U ij a , a , a are all between 0 and 1, and the value of risk factors are shown in Table I. Q j n  Q j  1 n Z j (6) TABLE I. T ABLE FOR VALUE OF RISK FACTOR definition Extremely important Strongly important Obviously important Slightly important Equally important Slightly unimportant Obviously not important Strongly unimportant Extremely unimportant Where, Q is the fuzzy quantization operator, its value is given by Equation (7). Value 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Q r C. Ranking of risk factors The ranking of risk factors is an important method to determine the comprehensive severity of risk factors. According to the ranking results, decision makers can focus on controlling more important risks in each risk. The ranking steps for risk factors are shown in Figure 3 [9] . ­ 0 , r  a ° r  a ° , a d r d b ® ° b  a °̄ 1 , r ! b > @ (7) Where, a , b , r  0,1 .The values corresponding to the fuzzy quantum are shown in Table II. 15