ILOTA Communique July/August/September 2018 | Page 10

Bridget Hahn, OTD, OTR/L Impact of Using a Knowledge Translation Framework to Increase Utilization of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills in a Rehabilitation Setting The Assessment of Motor Process Skills (AMPS) is a standardized assessment, used to examine the quality of a person’s occupational performance in a natural environment (Fischer & Jones, 2010). The use of such a standardized assessment is critical for occupational therapy to meet third party payer requirements, demonstrate the distinct value of the profession and maximize client outcomes. Measuring occupational performance also communicates the intervention to clients, colleagues, and payer sources, and guides occupation-based treatment. Furthermore, current evidence trends favor occupation-based over impairment-based interventions (Gillen et al, 2015; Tomori et al, 2015; Wolf, Chuh, Floyd, McInnis, & Williams, 2015). Although the AMPS is advantageous, work by Chard (2000, 2004, 2006) documents limitations of its utility in clinical practice. Barriers included: selecting clients, time, and computer access. The author used the knowledge to action (KTA) framework to develop an intervention for increased AMPS utilization in a rehabilitation setting (Straus, Tetroe, & Graham, 2013) (See Figure 1). Five AMPS calibrated therapists completed a pre and post survey assessing barriers, facilitators, and utilization of the AMPS. Ten of the questions were previously validated as part of the Detriments of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire (DIBQ) (Huijg, et al., 2014). The intervention was an online self-study and 2 workshops, 2 weeks apart. The intervention included: (a) critical discussion, (b) reflection, (c) case study, (d) peer partners, (e) actions plans, and (f ) protected treatment time. Additionally, the author: (a) collaborated with organization leaders, (b) made AMPS software available, and (c) created a location to document in the electronic medical record. Participants identified time, resources, scheduling, and client and task selection as barriers. The post survey results indicated decreased frequency Continued on Page 11 Page 10