IIC Journal of Innovation 7th Edition | Page 28

Outcomes, Insights and Best Practices from IIC Testbeds: MQM Testbed understand their specific needs and identify the elements and the process required to solve the problem. seriously. The IIRA and IISF were important resources from a technical perspective and were also used to help articulate the role of IoT for the end user. Their importance is also apparent in the collaborative nature of the publishing of these documents – because the IIRA and the IISF were each produced by a teams of experts from a wide spectrum of member organizations of the IIC, the documents carry a universal acceptance that the underlying recommendations and best practices will apply across solutions and vendors – not just a recommendation from Huawei, but a widely respected approach for the industry. IIC Foundational Documents as Resources Two technical documents which have benefited this Testbed greatly are the IIC’s IIRA and the Industrial Internet Security Framework (IISF). Because these two documents were available at the start of the MQM Testbed, they helped the testbed team easily lay out all that needed to be done to renovate Haier’s production process. Part of the reason Haier was initially reluctant to adopt IoT technology in their production process is because they have long-standing, separate routines across all of their different channels. The plans to implement IoT systems would require them to adapt a new architecture, which they were not yet prepared to do. The IIRA clearly describes the three-tier architecture the testbed team was recommending and provided a “visual” to support how all the IoT elements played together. With the guidance of the IIRA and the testbed team’s understanding of the challenges and elements of structuring the projected solution, Haier understood the steps and requirements and agreed to move forward with the project. Small Change, Huge Improvement The task of retrofitting the existing factory required in this project was not as difficult as originally thought because the initial assumption was they would need a high level of integration. However, a simple reevaluating of the design was all that was needed. Using the quality checking station as an example the testbed team originally thought they would need to retrofit the welding station with high tech sensors integrated with the welding head to monitor the welding process. After reviewing the whole process, the work was refocused on the quality check station, which proved to be a more manageable spot for the testbed. Furthermore, the trial run of the AI-based analytical engine did not provide satisfactory results: The microphone on the quality check station also picked up additional ambient noise. With some experimentation, the analytics were not able to filter out the ambient factory noise effectively. The performance was eventually optimized by placing the tested unit and the microphone in a “sound proof” chamber at the test station. There are implicit concerns about moving systems to the internet: exposure to the outside world, vulnerability to attacks, damage to the factory, etc. The first phase of the testbed project was managed locally so cyber security was not a primary concern. Fully automating so that Haier can link all of its factories in their own multi-site requires the cyber security risk to be addressed. At that time, the IISF provided guidance for Haier to understand the importance of taking security and safety matters very IIC Journal of Innovation - 27 -