iDentistry The Journal Volume 14 No 2 | Page 6

The Journal The bacterial theory stated that the existence of a high count of pre and postoperative bacteria’s around the extraction place in patients may lead to dry socket. The anaerobic bacteria’s are mainly found. The alveolar pain would be due to the effect of bacterial toxins in the nervous terminations of the alveolus. It was found in an animal model that Actinomyces viscous and Streptococcus mutants retard the alveolar post extraction healing. Also, a fibrinolytic activity has been observed with increased count of Treponema Denticola which was postulated by Nitzan as an etiologic factor in dry socket. However, it has not been universally accepted hypothesis due to lack of conclusive data. What are the risk factors? :-u Surgically extracted teeth : This could be due to more liberation of direct tissue activators secondary to bone marrow inflammation following more difficult extraction. Surgical extractions in comparison to non surgical extractions result in more increased incidence of dry socket. Dry socket occurrence according to Younis et al is 7.3% in case of single extractions and 3.4% in multiple extractions as multiple extractions are generally simple as they are performed on mobile and periodontically compromised teeth. Age : The incidence of dry socket increases with increased patient age due to compromised periodontal health. However exact age group may vary according to different authors. MacGregor reported the peak incidence in the age group of 30-34 years and Younis et al reported that dry socket is highest in third and fourth decades of life with peak incidence in 18- 33 years of age group. Gender : It is reported that prevalence of dry socket is more in female patients than in male patients. Use of oral contraceptives is a main factor that raises the prevalence of dry socket. Estrogen is responsible for increased plasma 5 fibrinolytic activity (increasing factors II, VII, VIII, X and plasminogen) and therefore increasing blood clot lysis. According to Sweet and Butler occurrence of dry socket is 4.1% while that of men is 0.5%. Mohammed et al, describes the prevalence as 2.5% in males and 4.3% in females. Bad habits : Smoking effects the socket healing. It reduces neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis and impede the production of immunoglobulin. Nicotine is found to be absorbed through oral mucosa and it act as a vasoconstrictor. Gardner also observed that there is removal of clot through suction and negative pressure during smoke inhalation. Pericoronitis : it has been observed that teeth with perocoronitis gives rise to increase in cases of dry socket. Operative procedures : It has been observed that extractions under general anesthesia are more prone to dry socket than that done under local anesthesia. Also a study indicated that dry socket is more prevalent where prilocaine with 1:200,00 epinephrine was used versus lidocaine with 1:100,00 epinephrine. According to them epinephrine could reduce bleeding and might interfere with oxygen tension thus reducing healing and also increases fibrinolysis. Although, Younis et al (2011) stated in a study that there is no significant role of local anesthesia. Another factor was found by Birn(1973) stated that excessive irrigation of alveolus might interfere with formation of clot and violent curettage may injure the alveolar bone. Whereas Butler conducted a study where one side was irrigated with 175ml of saline and other side was irrigated with 25ml and he found that instances of dry socket was more in low volume of irrigation than that in high volume irrigation. However no evidence confirmed these allegations. Vol. 14 No. 2 May-August 2018