iDentistry The Journal Volume 14 No 2 | Page 5

The Journal Etiology Two main etiological factors may include • Difficult or traumatic extraction, usually removal of impacted 3rd molars • Dislodgement and disintegration of clot and subsequent bone infection. Although exact pathogenesis is not known but there are many etiopathogenic theories that have intended to explain the dry socket which are Birn’s fibrinolytic theory and the Bacterial theory. Birn in 1973 showed increased fibrinolytic activity and activation of plasminogen to plasmin in the presence of tissue activators in dry socket. This activity was thought to effect the integrity of blood cloy after extraction. 4 Plasmin is the enzyme which hydrolyzes fibrin into soluble fragments and regulates the degree of fibrinolysis and is therefore main factor on fibrinolytic activity. Birn hypothesized that increase in fibrinolytic activity is mainly responsible for dry socket pathology. It was found higher in case of dry socket than that in case of normally healing extraction wounds. According to Birn, direct tissue activators are released after trauma to the alveolar bone cells converting plasminogen to plasmin which digests the fibrin clot, hence resulting in disintegration of clot leading to dry socket. He further investigated the fibrinolytic activity of alveolar bone, however, led to the realization that indirect activators could have a greater role in dry socket than was originally thought. Vol. 14 No. 2 May-August 2018