IDENTIDADES 1 ENGLISH IDENTIDADES 7 ENGLISH | Seite 132

ally recognized rights. According to Professor Martha Prieto Valdés, of the University of Havana’s Law School, the Court of Constitutional Guarantees progressively lost the power given to it by the Constitution until it openly declared, in a pronouncement in May 1967, that “constitutional articles are declared and pronounced as programmatic”2 and concluded that the constitutional precepts are not weakened through the exercise of ordinary laws. Since the Constitution, as a ruling document in the judicial nature of legal processes, was relegated, the power of the Constitutional and Social Guarantees Hall ended up significantly limiting itself. The change from Court to Hall had already taken place in the early sixties. According to the professor, those were the years in which Soviet legal texts permeated the teaching of Law in Cuba, and they derailed this field’s sense. One of the consequences of that intervention was the suppression of the Hall of Constitutional and Social Guarantees on May 25th, 1973. Cuban jurists have spent decades clamoring about the need to reactivate of a Court of Constitutional Guarantees to which everyone from judges to ordinary citizens could resort, when the law’s hegemony was threatened, as was the case before. According to Prieto Valdés, one of the reasons for getting rid of the Hall of Constitutional and Social Guarantees was the role played by this organ during the coup d’état that took out Fulgencio Batista, in March 1952: “A weighty argument in this decision was the criticism proffered against the Court of Guarantees, in 1952, because it justified the overthrow of Batista. Its conduct was labeled as treasonous, vile, cowardly and repugnant, and since then considered a useless institution regarding its power to guarantee the popular will.”3 The logic of appealing to an event to discredit the pertinence of an institution, and not only keep other institutions from taking over its responsibilities, but just letting them cease existing, has been essential in Castroism’s political practice. Carlos Rafael Rodríguez’s argument for justifying the delay in the Revolution’s institutionalization, and the Law School professor’s description, both respond strictly to only one procedure. Social consequences of institutional abandonment At this time, the disconnect between the individual and traditional institutions filled those spaces created by the revolutionary system, like mass organizations, the Cuban Communist Party, public plazas during the days of Fidel Alejandro Castro’s speeches, and places used for all sorts of mobilization (mostly agricultural work and military training). Yet, if in the beginning those people who went to those spaces could change fields, the organizational practices and commitment they brought with them from their recently dissolved cohort limited their ability to keep individuals with similar purposes together, and derive from those groups efficient disciplinary and training systems, and commitment. This resulted from the insufficiencies of these created institution that increased over time. Any individual linked to the Cuban economy saw that it was in irreversible decline, no 132