IDENTIDADES 1 ENGLISH IDENTIDADES 5 ENGLISH | Page 139

These creators are going to selflessly reveal without assent the task of the demystifying of rhetoric’s symbols using the iconography of the aesthetic of bad painting and graffiti. These contain fractured messages loaded with criticism of the attitudes and conduct of those who abuse their power, the arrogant offense and attitude of certain public figures regarding the use of sex as a symbol of authority and conceited power. tesque, along the lines of popular Cuban chauvinism, and achieve a mythological dimension that concomitantly seems to display both elements of art’s origins and also growing undesirability. By challenging habitual censorship, this new generation of creators, which received their training via Cuba’s national system of education, broke with the previous era. They rejected its sappy landscapes and fictitious realities, and chose to conduct its criticism via an aesthetic of worlds symbolic or parallel to reality. The provocative of these works base themselves on a tradition of the gro- The great 1989 performance, “Listos para vencer.” CSO. “José Antonio Echevarría” Then came a call for participation in the Third Havana Biennial, in NovemberDecember, 1989, in the midst of all these complex, socio-cultural conditions. Some new generation Cuban artists participated. The event offered a spectrum of diverse visual culture: Tradition and Contemporaneity was the thematic organizing concept for this Biennial. It was conceived of as an organic and integrating project with a view to the training of professional critics and theorists representing the institution of art. The goal was to help them develop an incessant and complex search for information, and the discovery of find ing new paths or spaces in which to reform their own underpinnings. An elaborate installation by Glexis Novoa (from her so-called “practical period”) was exhibited at the Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes (MNBA) during the Third Biennial. It was an allusive exhibit whose goal was to ironically point to the art system’s mechanisms and gears. Its own techné was itself a sharp critique: he paints slogans that say 139