IB Prized Writing Sevenoaks School IB Prized Writing 2014 | Page 212

Emma Rixhon - Philosophy To what extent are acts of individual rebellion necessary for social progress? harming them than free speech may. In addition, racist, misogynist, or homophobic  insults  may  well  be  “a  violation  of  good  manners”  yet  Mill  is  not  at   all opposed to them. In other words, Mill is adopting here a Victorian attitude towards  public  indecency,  which  isn’t  in  keeping  with  the  rest  of  his  text.   Regardless  of  Mill’s  judgements,  Gough  can  be  viewed  as  a  successful  individual   who has increased awareness of human body rights, and would therefore be seen as a rebel by Camus. However he does not fulfil the criteria of having brought about social change, as the attitude towards public nudity has not developed greatly since his involvement. On the other hand, if the government ever approved of his theories and the general public embraced them, we would undeniably attribute to him some sense of liberating revolution. The idea that it is the masses that determine the success of a revolution brings about a further point. There are many individuals who believe their ideas to be progressive and ameliorative for society, yet are generally agreed upon to be wrong. This poses a problem though: as all rebels will meet against opposition, what criterion can we apply to decide who is rebelling for a good cause and who is rebelling for a bad cause? Rebellions which occurred in the past demanding rights for women, homosexuals, and other minorities are now praised because we have evolved as a society to accept that gender, sexuality, and the colour of skin should not define us as lesser or greater beings. Though this view is still not held by all, it is undeniable that it is infinitely more widespread amongst our societies today than even eighty years ago. Nevertheless, there have been individuals with a strong indignation against certain states of affairs who have not successfully rebelled. Donatien Alphonse François, the Marquis of Sade, was a revolutionary Frenchman who believed in extreme freedom of choice. He was strongly inclined towards violence and criminality, and wrote many philosophical texts entwined with violent eroticism. However, his views were not popular and he was settled in an insane asylum for much of his life. The success of certain individualist rebellions and failures of others brings about the problem not of the importance of the rebel, but of the society around them. Social progress happens not only when one speaks out against an injustice, but when the society concerned is ready to make the change. 211 8