IB Prized Writing Sevenoaks School IB Prized Writing 2014 | Page 211

Emma Rixhon - Philosophy To what extent are acts of individual rebellion necessary for social progress? completely disregards. Communitarianism is the idea that society as a whole needs to be at the centre of our concern rather than the individuals who form it. Individuals are therefore not building blocks or units of society rather than an interlinked mass whose relationships form society. Marx agreed with this theory, and claimed that humans could only be seen as labourers whose efforts benefitted society. Therefore, it may be possible that social progress cannot be attributed to acts of individual rebellion rather than to a series of events deeply engrained in humans’  desire  to  promote  the  good  of  their  community.   Stephen Gough, more commonly known as the Naked Rambler, has been imprisoned over twenty times due to his choice to not wear clothes. However, he continues to walk nude in public and carries on being fined and imprisoned for indecency because he believes it is a human right to be naked. Whether or not public  nudity  is  a  human  right,  Gough  definitely  experiences  “revulsion  at  the   infringement of his rights [and] complete and spontaneous loyalty to certain aspects  of  himself.” 16 Camus claims that this is present in every act of rebellion, meaning that each rebellious act implies a strong sense of self-worth in the rebel. They  are  not  acting  out  of  concern  for  someone  else’s  rights,  but  because  they   feel their own have been breached. In this case, a strong sense of individualism is also required in order to rebel, as one who blindly follows the crowd will not see their importance as any greater than that of another  member  of  the  crowd’s,  nor   will they desire to see a change in their treatment. In addition to being a clear example  of  Camus’  notion  of  rebellion,  Gough’s  naked  rambling  brings  up  a  flaw   in  Mill’s  argument.  Throughout   On Liberty, Mill advocates allowing people to act freely as long as they do not harm others. However, he also declares, “There  are   many acts which, being directly injurious only to the agents themselves, ought not to be legally interdicted, but which, if done publicly, are a violation of good manners, and coming thus within the category of offences against others, may rightly  be  prohibited.” 17 Discreet as he is, it is clear Mill is writing about ideas such as the difference between marital sex at home and say, having sex in public. Though this may make others uncomfortable, it comes in no way closer to 16 17 Camus, A. 1971 p19 Mill, JS. 2006 p110-111 210 7