Huffington Magazine Issue 70 | Page 59

BACHRACH/GETTY IMAGES WITH LIBERTY AND LEISURE FOR ALL the war effort. As the war’s end drew near, unions argued for the six-hour day as a way to reduce the inevitable unemployment of returning troops, but when the unemployment didn’t happen, the shorter-hours movement lost steam. Anti-Communist sentiment during the Cold War didn’t help. Calls for shorter hours have remained scarce in recent decades. Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) pushed for a 35-hour week in 1979. “One of the chief methods of keeping unemployment in check during the Depression was the adoption of the 40-hour workweek,” Conyers said at the time. “During the past 30 years, however, the workweek has remained substantially unchanged, despite the frequency of massive unemployment, large-scale technological displacement of human labor, and considerable gains in productivity. We ought to look at reducing the working week and spreading employment among a greater number of workers, once again, as a means to reducing joblessness without sacrificing productivity.” The AFL-CIO backed the legislation, but Republicans said it would cause inflation, and it didn’t get much attention. As Roediger and Foner have pointed out, dips in the number of working hours are now largely seen “not as labor victories but as omens of a deteriorating economy.” Conyers hasn’t revisited his proposal for shorter hours as a response to the current economic crisis. Instead, he recently supported taxing banks and using the money to pay for public jobs, a proposal partly modeled after the New Deal’s Works Progress Administration. “Since the depression, public policy has been designed to maintain ‘adequate demand’ and ‘full employment,’” Hunnicutt writes. “Government deficit spending, liberal Treasury policies, increased Sen. Hugo Black called a 30-hour work week the “only practical and possible method of dealing with unemployment” during the Great Depression.