B"H
purpose to their madness; they scandalize to death anyone who
rejects their view.
Do academics have reliability; well they're supposed to use a
syste m called "the scientific method, " to eliminate every
possibility except the one conclusion that stands up to every
investigation. Could an official, elected to serve the public,
propagate a view that was not to the advantage of the g enera l
public, would a government agency label as a myth, a scam, this
theory about global warming - if not altering the course of events
which is causing the threat to the well -being of mother Earth and
her creatures? According to certain me mbers of indiv iduals in the
2017 USA government, a scientist who claims there is much to be
done to overcome threats to the environment is a psychotic person ;
paranoia, he or she believes that something is out to harm the m,
or seek glory beyond their reach of reality.
The early twenty-first century in an ever-expanding universe o f
digital information, much of which is contradictory. What's
common to most humanity; at every reach of the globe, is that we
have fallen into a botto mless abyss above which stand the
technocrats who pride the mselves in what they claim to have
achieved. "We've wired the world !" There are people walking
around with microchips implanted under their skin, as required b y
their employers. In order to co mply with the simple procedures o f
"proper registration" to receive the benefits society doles out, we
have to tender control of all data pertaining to our private matters.
There is no privacy, no trust, and no mutual respect: humanity has
been stripped of our soul, we are people bereft of raison d'etre (the
purpose of life).
And where do I, your author, stand in all this? Take this phrase,
"I, your author" maybe as I'm writing these words, I'm really doing
this as a spy devising personality traits that the Greedy Marauders
wish to have implanted into yo ur character (brainwash you), and
by reading this, you're unconsciously subscribing to the m. In the
modern era, most of our minds are subject to sublimina l
advertising, and it's only a step from there to political ideology.
One need do a slight introspecti on to tune into his inner hatred,
who so less good than he is an evil entity unto itself, which has to
be destroyed. How do we determine to which ideology we attac h
ourselves as loyal believers, willing to do anything so we're
considered part of those for who m the shared principle is sacred?
3