B"H
Thoughts Abound
Like surfing waves of thought, our author brings many ideas to
our attention in this writing, an interesting endeavor more filled
with entertainment than I could imagine. A raging ravaging o f
precious treasures redacted in a history book in an old-time book
jacket, sitting in a bookshop in a faraway place. It's his story
(history) because the author writes about the intention of so meone
to get the best of beastly being , bare handed fighting a bear and
winning. A real live person who lives in the late twentieth century,
a person who co mbatted with mental illness most of his seven
decades upon the face of the earth; e arned the best self-contro l
award. The author has developed and learned to co mmunicate in
the language of mental imbalance, and I find it to be increasingly
universal in the common modern era; in short, people want to
believe that what they think is true.
That goes to say that people don't communicate much at all.
They use phrases to get the message across; the utility of speec h
being an action produced. Now the electronic answerin g services
know all the possibilities and we are forced to communicate in
their language of binary operations; press number get reply. I love
to tell the story about the bus driver whom, when asked, "how long
until I disembark," The passenger repeated the question and got
the same answer many times! A t one of the stops his wife awaited
at a bus stop, and when the door seized the opp ortunity to ask him,
"When will you be ho me for lunch "? The driver replied, "I'll tell
you when we get there," as had been inst ructed to respond to every
question that begins with the word "when." People live what the y
want in terms of their life's limitations and capabilities. Anything
else is an alien co mmunication.
Nowadays, "if you want" is a comma nd to protect the reliabilit y
of the doctrines perpetuated to gain my loyalty; if you want to
believe me then good, but if not it'll be too bad for you. We have
been convinced that we live in utter dependence upon "the m" to
protect us from threat to our existence. These doctrines spew out
malevolence towards any other opinion that any one may have,
heretofore the example: Researched and found believable, their
opinion is always right, as stated. For instance, people on the
opposing sides as to how we view climate catastrophe, which in
our times has become a political issue. Do sane people denigrate
everything that doesn't coincide to their opinion , yet there is
2