B"H
describe the David, the king of Israel. We are not talking about
that, are we, we're talking about where an old man who acts like
a twerp and abuses his authority as a trusted guardian of huma n
faith and regulation. He grapples within himself to explain how
the little girl enjoys his petting her private places, while
desperately confronting the possibility he would be jailed for it.
We hear of people being investigated, litigation being brought
to a judicator many years after the event. I ponder the early
cultures of African societies and the seeming ease men felt
though exposed to female nakedness.
Contrarily, we are talking about a physical sensation such as
can be procured through media sold by electronics merchants
without threat of ostracism or punishment; we are discussing a
psychological need prejudiced by vainglory to get something for
nothing. The ethical mandate is to outwit the evil lurking within ;
advance the posit ion of one's genuine concern for his humanity,
not to mention mercy enough to spare his victim the trauma
eventually to burst forth. The scientific method is utilized to
arrive at the truth by subjecting every possibility to rejectio n
and finally to come up with an assumption that cannot be
overturned. Obviously, there may be many truths , but dignity is
the singular path to self-respect. Only after the age of seventy-
five do men lose the ability for an erotic focus, and experience
difficulty with erection a nd orgasm, so one can get an early jump
on learning to demonstrate tempered celibacy towards
humwomben as a being with purpose unto herself.
To project or reject the feasibility of this approach one has to
study the biological circumstances that distinguis h the two
characters, a man who embraces self -restraint, pitted against a
lusting predator within himself. Human society has forever
asserted a doctrine of fe male passivity though her private
domain be intruded or imposed upon, by a male determined to
experience organis m, cavemen "clubbing a wo man" and
dragging her into a cave. This propaganda is at best one-sided,
an excuse for a liability that the weak cannot refute and fro m
which the culture merchants profit millions and billions . The
desire, in the mind of the men that cannot distinguish the
innocence of a child fro m the matured function of an adult, can
drive the m to perversity, child pornography. This illness has
plagued the good conscience of humanity , as evidenced the
breadth and extent of human chronicles.
250