Hazard Risk Resilience Magazine Volume 1 Issue 2 | Page 15

15 Religion and humaneness MOST religions invoke the idea of a deity or divine intelligence in some form or another that may seem foreign to the actual human condition. But, if the separation between the human and the divine is turned on its head, it looks much different from what is generally supposed. Regardless of the actual existence of the divine, knowledge of it is always mediated through human thought and action. Humans are capable of taking some of the worst situations, such as catastrophes, and transforming them into something positive or extraordinary while using the idea of divine powers in the process. Learning to cope with disaster may lead to resilience, but also individual transformation. Ideas and myths about the interaction between humanity and the divine go back many thousands of years, and are invoked again and again when earth shaking events occur. While divinity, which means ‘having the nature of a deity’ and humaneness may appear separate in practice they are both channelled through the individual human experience and emotions. ‘The view of the event as an ‘act of God’ might resonate appropriately with a person’s emotional state and at the same time fly in the face of reason’, says philosopher Dr Guy Bennett-Hunter, an Honourary Research Associate at Durham University and a Research Fellow at the University of Aberdeen. Religion and religious experience is used in many ways to provide a sense of purpose and in the case of the Javanese in Indonesia and the Muslims and Buddhists in Thailand, what they experience is the basis for how they interpret it religiously, which helps regulate their actions. ‘No one coping with the aftermath of a tsunami will be worried about whether the divine attributes are consistent’, says Bennett-Hunter, ‘…religion will be the means by which they re-evaluate the meaning of their existence in light of their situation’. Even if researchers learned nearly everything needed to plan for or mitigate disasters the problem of how people would respond individually still exists. This is often based on the relationship they have within their respective religious communities. ‘It is suggested that the word ‘religion’ derives from the Latin ligare (to bind). Instead of religion preventing care for victims of disaster, …we might hope that religion would function as its Latin root implies and bind people together, leading them to work together for the benefit of their whole community, says Bennett-Hunter. In disaster risk reduction this could not be more crucial.