Harvard International Review | Page 51

a competent and proper host. Most importantly, its labor system will further antagonize it in the eyes of the international community. Here, Qatar’s successful bid, given the nature of its labor system, alludes to major oversight on the part of FIFA in its selection process. Considering the many violations of human and labor rights that Qatar has made, it is necessary to cogitate rescinding Qatar’s successful bid to host the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Dangling the threat of rescission may lead to two actions: motivating Qatar to change its labor practices, or forcing FIFA to take the bid away from Qatar. The labor system is arguably the most contentious issue in Qatar, and there is no sign of change in its practice. The labor system is known as the kafala system. The kafala, or sponsorship, system is also present in other Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman and the UAE, but none of these other nations are as strict in their implementation of the kafala as Qatar. Qatar has the highest proportion of migrant to native population out of all of the countries that use the kafala system. It also had the highest number of migrants from Summer 2014 • H A R V A R D I N T E R N A T I O N A L R E V I E W 51 R ed C ard An Excess of Heat, A Lack of Culture The Kafala System the FIFA’s awarding of the 2018 and 2022 World Cup bids to Russia and Qatar, respectively, was wrapped in controversy because of opaque bidding procedures. Allegedly, FIFA executives were bribed during the selection process for the next two World Cups. Outside officials were given authority to conduct a thorough ethics investigation on the awarding of the bids. Outside officials are those who have had no ties to any financial dealings with soccer in the past four years