Harvard International Review | Page 20

PERSPECTIVES With the evolving tensions in the East and South China Seas, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said that the United States was concerned about China and its “dangerous conduct and intimidation” in the Pacific. Directly referring to the HD-981 rig in the Paracels, she added that “China’s unilateral decision to introduce its oil rig into these disputed waters [with Vietnam] is provocative and unhelpful.” Furthermore, referring to Japan and South Korea, the Deputy National Security Advisor at the White House remarked that “we have reaffirmed our support for our mutual defense treaties with allies in the region, and have supported the efforts of the Philippines to pursue international arbitration to resolve maritime disputes.” For the latter, Washington and Manila have signed a defense agreement to have regular joint military activities, occasional training exercises, and rotational troop visits at the Subic Naval and Clark Air Force Bases (which were returned by the US Forces to the Philippines in 1991). Yet, American rhetoric has signaled that the Philippines must use the international tribunal process for conflict resolution, which purposefully sent an ambiguous policy message to Beijing. Unlike the US-Philippines pact, Washington does not have a defense treaty with Hanoi, but the potential for American access to Cam Ranh Bay—a deep-water naval base on the South China Sea—is a sensitive matter for Beijing. The Chinese and Vietnamese militaries have direct contacts at the highest level; the two communist governments also share close economic and trade ties. Recent political posturing in Hanoi and Washington may signify a change of policy, which might shift the balance of power in the South China Sea. A New Type of Rebalance When the state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) decided to locate the sophisticated US$1 billion HD-981 oil rig within the contested Exclusive Economic Zone near the Paracel Islands, it sent more than a message of economic necessity; it is, in essence, a démarche. Once again, with another oil rig in the planning and building of an airport and library, and settling Chinese people on the Paracel Islands, Beijing basically claims the sovereignty of the maritime territory demarcated by its historical but controversial “nine-dash-line”. There is another element to this strategic posture. A few years ago, the US-based Exxon Mobil made two exploratory drillings and discovered significant reserves of oil and gas near the Paracels. (The US Energy Information Administration, however, maintains that no substantial oil and gas reserves exist in the area). The CNOOC rig is carefully situated in proximity to these potential deposits. The American economic and corporate interests will complicate the matter. It is no longer just an issue of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, but a global one including the US and China. Political rhetoric will remain active while economic interests that tie these countries together are difficult to ignore. The stakeholders—especially the Philippines and 20 Vietnam—can ill afford to alienate China and its much needed economic and developmental aid. Especially as the geographically-distant United States can hardly fulfill the material needs and aspirations of its Pacific allies and friends. All of these multifaceted relationships work simultaneously with competing national identities and economic interests. Military-to-Military Relations The economically intertwined Sino-American relationship has now shifted to the deepening of military-to-military relations for greater confidence-building and cooperation. US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s visit to the first Chinese aircraft carrier—the Liaoning—in April was followed by a celebrated reciprocal visit of General Fang Fenghui, chief of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to tour the nuclear-powered USS Ronald Reagan in San Diego in early May. In Washington, Fang also met with his counterpart General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, after welcoming him in a full red-carpet honors ceremony at the Pentagon and subsequent visits to military installations. This is an encouraging sign of military-tomilitary relations as PLA Navy Chief Admiral Wu Shengli also visited the USS Carl Vinson last year. As the Fang-Dempsey meetings took place in Washington, the HD-981 incident between China and Vietnam incited anti-Chinese protesters in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and elsewhere. Public protests—with damage to Chinese and other factories—would scarcely take place in Vietnam without the tacit approval of the communist government in Hanoi. As Washington warms up to Hanoi with the intention of providing military support (similar to the Philippines), Sino-American military relations are strengthening at the highest level. With historical military links between the two communist parties and ever-increasing trade and investment between China and Vietnam, the two countries are trying to prevent further escalation. The damage to other factories owned by South Korean, Taiwanese, and Singaporean companies also signifies that these public protests are directed at “Political rhetoric will remain active while economic interests that tie these countries together are difficult to ignore. ” the prevailing industrial and labor issues in Vietnam. Hence, both Beijing and Hanoi need to recognize the poor human working condition