Global Security and Intelligence Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Spring/Summer 2018 | Page 34
Global Security and Intelligence Studies • Volume 3, Number 1 • Spring / Summer 2018
Strategic Warning and Anticipating
Surprise: Assessing the Education and
Training of Intelligence Analysts
Richard J. Kilroy Jr.
Coastal Carolina University
Katie Brooks
Coastal Carolina University
Abstract
Education of intelligence analysts is important in how the nation responds
to emerging threats. In the last 15 years, a number of colleges
and universities have developed undergraduate intelligence studies
programs, with the intent that many of their graduates would pursue
careers in the intelligence community. The purpose of this article
is to examine the extent to which these undergraduate degree
programs are providing students the requisite knowledge, skills, and
abilities to become intelligence analysts. The methodology employed
consists of conducting content analysis of syllabi from schools offering
courses in intelligence analysis to compare and contrast student
learning outcomes, pedagogy, assessment, use of analytic tools and
processes (such as structured analytical techniques, simulations, and
exercises), and other instructional methodologies. It also includes
interviewing faculty teaching in these programs, as well as interviewing
intelligence analysts currently working in the intelligence
community and instructors at the professional schools which train
intelligence analysts. This article argues that while undergraduate
education in intelligence analysis does a good job in exposing students
to the unique challenges intelligence analysts face in assessing
threats and providing strategic warning, an overemphasis on using
structured analytical techniques in some of these courses may not
be providing students with the critical thinking skills necessary to
become intelligence analysts who are able to anticipate strategic
surprise.
Key Terms: Intelligence analysis, structured analytical techniques,
intelligence community, education, training, strategic surprise, critical
thinking
33
doi: 10.18278/gsis.3.1.3