Get The Big Diabetes Lie Review PDF eBook Book Free | Page 26

Diabetes, which had a per-capita incidence of 0.0028% at the turn of the century,
had by 1933 exploded by 1,000% in the United States to become a disease seen by
many doctors. 8 This disease, under a variety of aliases, was destined to go on to
wreck the health of over half the American population and incapacitate almost 20%
by the 1990s. 9
In 1950, the medical community became able to perform serum insulin assays.
These assays quickly revealed that this new disease wasn't classic diabetes; it was
characterized by sufficient, often excessive, blood insulin levels.
The problem was that the insulin was ineffective; it did not reduce blood sugar. But
since the disease had been known as diabetes for almost 20 years, it was renamed
Type II diabetes. This was to distinguish it from the earlier Type I diabetes, caused
by insufficient insulin production by the pancreas.
Had the dietary insights of the previous 20 years dominated the medical scene from
that point and into the late 1960s, diabetes would have become widely recognized as
curable instead of merely treatable. Instead, in 1950, a search was launched for
another wonder drug to deal with the Type II diabetes problem.
Cure versus Treatment
This new, ideal wonder drug would be effective, like insulin, in remitting obvious
adverse symptoms of the disease but not effective in curing the underlying disease .
Thus it would need to be taken continually for the remaining life of the patient. It
would have to be a patentable drug because natural medication is not patentable.
Like insulin, it would have to be cheap to manufacture and distribute. Mandatory
government approvals would be required to stimulate physicians to prescribe it as a
prescription drug. Testing required for these approvals would have to be
enormously expensive to prevent other new medications from becoming competitive.
Additionally, natural medications that actually cure disease would have to be
suppressed. The more effective they were, the more they would need to be
suppressed and their proponents jailed as quacks. After all, it wouldn't be very
profitable for big pharma if diseases could be cured with cheap alternative methods.
This is the origin of the classic medical protocol of "treating the symptoms". By
doing this, both the drug company and the doctor could prosper in business, and the
patient, while not being cured of his disease, would just be temporarily relieved of
some of his symptoms.
www.theictm.org
Preview - 7 Steps to Health and the Big Diabetes Lie