• Fair portion of increased fish stock by this tech would go to current food importing or starved low agri tech nations, where various interlocked group members with technological & financial stronghold, IMF / WB lending and compulsory economic restructuring contract( to suit western establishment ' s control of those nations) etc would have lot to lose abruptly. This research finds some portion of mainstream interlocked groups are accommodating gradual low cost technological propagation but official overt endorsement of this particular tech might cause the loss too suddenly even for those " white hat groups "' s tolerance standard.
• This type of geopolitically risky relative low-tech( eg Coal Water Slurry, Various water based over-unity energy production, Practically free medical effect stronger than mainstream methods [ eg Homeopathic vaccine ] for majority of chronic disease) might be better off to be practised quietly without endorsement by " credible " people at this time.
• Temporal win-win scenario: If allowed unofficially, this benefits fish growth operators & knowledged group of people " who foolishly believe it works " while establishment can continue to keep food stock etc control world wide with little such tech deployment, due to most people still only believe in mainstream news approved tech.