Evidencias Sujeto Educación Y Sociedad EvidenciasSujetoEducacionySociedad_GuerraOchoa_Irv | Page 96

De Ketele, J.-M. 1996. L’évaluation des acquis scolaires : quoi ? Pourquoi ? Pour quoi ? Revue
Tunisienne des Sciences de l’Éducation, 23, pp. 17-36.
D'Hainaut, L. 1977, 3e édition 1983. Des Fins aux Objectifs. Paris-Bruxelles: Nathan-Labor.
Duru-Bellat, M. and Bydanova, L. 2011. Structure des systèmes éducatifs et inégalités sociales de
performance. In V. Dupriez & N. Mons, Les politiques d’accountability, du changement
institutionnel aux transformations locales. Revue d’Education comparée, n°5, pp. 157-186.
Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of Mind: the Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. 2006. Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice. New York: Basic
Books.
Gardner, H. 2008. Les Intelligences Multiples : la Théorie qui Bouleverse nos Idées Reçues. Paris : Retz.
Gilles, J.-L. 2003. Smart, Consignes Concernant les Degrés de Certitude. Liège, Université de Liège
www.smart.ulg.ac.be/smartweb/outils/guess/ (Accessed 1 July 2015.)
Goleman, D. 1995. Emotional Intelligence: Why it can Matter More Than IQ. Bloomsbury Publishing
PLC, New edition (1996).
Gronlund, N. E. 1999. Assessment of Student Achievement. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Grossman, D. 2008. Democracy, citizenship education and inclusion: a multi-dimensional approach.
Prospects, Vol. XXXVIII, n°1, mars 2008, pp. 35-46.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11125-008-9054-1 (Accessed 1 July 2015.)
Gulikers, J. T. J., Bastiaens, T. J. and Kirschner, P. A. 2004. A five-dimensional framework for authentic
assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67.
https://racetothetopvolusia.wikispaces.com/file/view/A+Five+Dimensional+Framework+for+
Authentic+Assessment.pdf (Accessed 1 July 2015.)
Hartog, P. and Rhodes, E. 1935. An Examination of Examinations. Londres: Mac Millan.
Hayton, G. and Wagner, Z. M. 1998. Performance assessment in vocational education and training.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Vocational Education Research, 6(1), pp. 69-85.
http://vital.new.voced.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/ngv:28557/SOURCE2
(Accessed 1 July 2015.)
Helgøy, I. and Homme, A.D. 2011. Individual or collective responses to accountability policies. A

comparative study of teacher professionalism in Norway and Sweden. In V. Dupriez & N.
Mons, Les politiques d’accountability, du changement institutionnel aux transformations
locales. Revue d’Education Comparée, n°5, pp. 107-131.
Jacobs, L. C. 2004. How to Write Better Tests: a Handbook for Improving Test Construction Skills.
Indiana University Bloomington Evaluation Services & Testing.
http://www.indiana.edu/~best/write_better_tests.shtml (Accessed 1 July 2015.)
Jonnaert, Ph. (Dir.) 2010. Approche par situations – Matrice du traitement compétent d’une
situation. Cahiers de la CUDC, (1010)5, numéro thématique.
Keunho, Ly. 2014. Competency-based curriculum and curriculum autonomy in the Republic of Korea.
IBE Working Papers on curriculums issues, n°12.
http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Working_Papers/curriculu
m_development_KoreaRep_ibewpci_12_eng.pdf (Accessed 1 July 2015.)
Kincheloe, Joe L., ed. 2004. Multiple Intelligences Reconsidered. Counterpoints v. 278. New York: Peter Lang.
Laugier, H. and Weinberg, D. 1938. Recherche sur la Solidarité et L’interdépendance des Aptitudes
Intellectuelles d’Après les Notes des Examens Ecrits du Baccalauréat. Paris: Chantenay.
42