We pitted the DF-760E analyzer against a CRDS-based device to measure moisture in a response time test. The DF-760E showed an immediate |
H2Op |
7.000
6.000
5.000
|
DF-760E |
H2Op |
7.000
6.000
5.000
|
CRDS |
response, with a T90 response |
4.000 |
4.000 |
||||
time measurement in less than 3 minutes. The CRDS took longer than 20 minutes and did not reach T90 point. The |
3.000
2.000
1.000
|
3.000
2.000
1.000
|
result? TDLAS clearly beats CRDS to the punch. |
|
|