The reality of human clones, explained by Donald Marshall
DM: Furthermore, organs from duplicate clones( clones grown via duplication cloning) are not compatible for transplantation into natural born humans / real humans; the organs from duplicate clones are grown too quickly, and therefore these organs are rejected in the bodies of real humans. Only organs from replicate clones( clones which start life off as babies) via the process of replication cloning are viable for transplantation into the body of the original, natural born person the clone was grown from. However, replication cloning is a very long process, and the replicate clone must grow and mature, for the organs to mature, and this takes many years. We also thread into many moral and ethical grounds if we are to consider growing replicate clones as“ insurance policies” for the purpose of organ transplantation for original humans, because as it has already been discussed, replicate clones, develop a mind and personality, much different than the original person they were cloned from, and for many people it is morally and ethically unsound to grow replicate clones of ourselves, simply to harvest their organs at a future date, because the original person is in need of a transplant. Furthermore, because replicate clones develop minds and personalities much different from the original, it also becomes morally and ethically unsound to grow a sentient conscious entity solely for the purpose of organ harvesting, and this leads to many, many ethically and moral considerations with regards to replicate clones.
Overall, human clones are not good for much... human clones are always dumber than the original person they have been cloned from; whether this is a Mark 1 REM driven clone( also known as an“ Organic Robotoid”) or Mark 2 REM driven clone a person has their consciousness transferred to while they sleep; the person will be dumber as a clone version, while they are activated as a Mark 1 or Mark 2 REM driven clone. It is the same situation with Mark 3 and Mark 4 clones; although Mark 3 and Mark 4 clones are independent clones which operate on their own consciousness, via a microchip. Furthermore, given the fact that Mark 3 and Mark 4 clones also allow simultaneous consciousness or duality consciousness, between the original person and the independent clone( in other words, through thought alone, the original person can control his or her Mark 3 or Mark 4 clone), these independent clones( Mark 3 and Mark 4 clones) are STILL dumber than the original person. On some occasions replicate clones( clones which start life off as a baby) are also dumber than the original, natural born person; this is more evident with re-animated clones( clones of dead people who once lived on earth). Re-animated clones tend to display, different psychological and behavioural traits, and ways of thinking much different than natural born huma n beings, especially re-animated clones who have been created from remains of individuals who lived thousands of years ago. The DNA gene print is ancient and therefore, these re-animated clones tend to be dumber than naturally born humans. The reduced intelligence, as well as, the reduced decision making aptitudes of human clones is a side effect nobody is immune to. It doesn’ t matter how intelligent an original person is; their human clone equivalent, is always slightly dumber than the original person... Tila Tequila is reading my posts as we speak. * Smiling *; * Laughter * May 21, 2012 at 10:52pm
3SG2: I am so happy you are not like Tila Tequila Donny... We are so lucky; you will not be bought, or bribed by the Illuminati... You rock! [ You are really great!] * Smiling *
68 | P a g e