Donald Marshall. Illuminati Exposed. 6 | Page 199

Appendix B : Legislation
The references to the legislature listed below are reminders , that in the United Kingdom :
� The disclosures about the Illuminati ’ s REM driven human cloning subculture qualifies under Public Interest Disclosure Act ( 1998 ) ( PIDA ) (‘ whistle-blowing disclosure act ’).
� Under the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act ( ERRA ) 2013 section 17 ( The new ‘ public interest ’ test ) is added for whistle blowing disclosures , amending section 43B of the Employment Rights Act ( ERA ) 1996 and therefore now reads as such ( new words underlined ): a ' qualifying disclosure ' means any disclosure of information which , in the reasonable belief of the worker making the disclosure , is made in the public interest and tends to show one or more of the following-- [ criminal offence , breach of legal obligation , etc ]; the disclosures pertaining to the Illuminati ’ s REM driven human cloning subculture meet the requirements set out in the ‘ public interest test ’, ERRA section 17 , and are therefore made in the public interest .
� That it is a serious crime ( Serious Crime Act 2015 ; Computer Misuse Act 1990 ), punishable by imprisonment , a fine , or both , to cite hatred or spread hoaxes by use of a computer which would cause mass hysteria or public dissension .
Nonetheless , despite Mr . Donald Marshall condemning many , many public figures , there has never been a single public figure named by Mr . Marshall who has issued a statement against Mr . Marshall for libel , slander , defamation etc ., since 2011 when Mr . Marshall started to denounce public figures for their involvement in the Illuminati ’ s REM driven human cloning subculture . Consequently , one should first look to the law in order to understand that Mr . Marshall IS providing accurate and detailed factual information relevant to the Illuminati ’ s REM driven human cloning subculture , otherwise Mr . Marshall would have been fined or imprisoned many years ago for either : slandering names , ( possibly ) inciting a public panic and using a computer to do so . The references to the relevant legislature , is p rovided on the following page .
199 | P a g e