Discover Civil may | Page 50

Technology   that about a quarter of out of 131,000 bridges are over 100 years old. Provide 100% mechanised track maintenance on the main routes to provide for superior quality of track laying and maintenance. Shouldn't the focus be on modernising and upgrading the entire system instead of investing 98000 crores in HSR? The objective of the project is to reduce train travel time between Ahmedabad and Mumbai from the current eight hours to two hours. The Shinkansen trains in Japan carry between 1300 and 1600 passengers in each train. That is equal to what 7 Airbus 320 neo aircraft can carry – 1600 train passengers / 240 plane passengers = 7 aircraft (240 passengers per Airbus 320 neo). The reason behind the whopping investment too is justified. But before justifying the investment you should understand the investment chronology of this project. After so much chaos about 98k crore investment nobody understood that its not going to affect the mordernisation of current system since Japan is funding the project up to 81% of the project cost, with a very low interest component of 0.3%, payment period extending to 40 years, and with no payment to be made for the first 10 years. Project tenure is of 8 years I which India will be investing 15390 crore in eight years i.e. approx. 2000 crore a year. So all the load voices against the investment in Bullet Trains are worthless specially with such a long tenure of repayment of Japanese Loan. Our Take Is it Expensive? So we saw all types of assessment regarding the introduction of Bullet Trains in India at the cost of leaving already ailing Railway Infrastructure. Japanese systems are often more expensive than their counterparts, because they run on dedicated elevated guide ways, avoid traffic crossings and incorporate disaster monitoring systems. The largest part of Japan's cost is for boring tunnels through mountains. India too would have elevated corridor. Well if someone has closely watched the Railway Budget of 2015, Suresh Prabhu has clearly conveyed that no new trains would be announced to add burden to already suffering infrastructure rather the funds would be used to improve the infrastructure and introduce technology to avoid accidents, fatigues and to make trains more punctual. “The next five years should change the face of Indian Railways. Faster trains, modern trains, swanky stations, skilled staff, should be the railways of tomor