Dialogue Volume 11 Issue 4 2015 | Page 76

discipline summaries investigator noted there was no sign posted. Dr. Saul acknowledged that he did not, at any time, consult with the College as to how he should comply with the undertaking in light of the fact that his new office did not have a waiting room and that he breached his undertaking by failing to post a sign advising of his prescribing restrictions. In the course of issuing medical declarations relating to Health Canada medical marihuana authorizations, Dr. Saul admitted that he dated some of these medical declarations as of December 31, 2011, when he had actually seen the relevant patients and completed these medical declarations earlier that month. Dr. Saul’s stated reason for post-dating was to maximize the timeframe for which the marihuana authorizations obtained by his patients would be valid after December 31, 2011. Dr. Saul admitted that he issued medical declarations that were inaccurate and misleading in this respect. Reasons for Penalty Counsel for the College and counsel for the member made a joint submission as to an appropriate penalty and costs order. The proposed order included a suspension, restrictions (terms, conditions and limitations) on Dr. Saul’s certificate of registration, a reprimand and education in professional ethics. In addition, Dr. Saul will pay costs to the College. The Committee reviewed the submissions of the parties and their proposed penalty order in detail and accepted the penalty as an appropriate sanction in the matter. In coming to this conclusion, the Committee had regard for the applicable law, relevant penalty principles, the nature and extent of the misconduct, aggravating and/or mitigating factors and the case law submitted jointly by the parties. Each is addressed in the following discussion. Dr. Saul signed the undertaking following a College investigation into his maintenance of the standard of practice of the profession. The undertaking is clear and unambiguous, stating, that Dr. Saul will no longer provide Medical Declarations to Health Canada relating to medical marihuana authorizations. Further, in the preamble to the undertaking, Dr. Saul agreed that he was bound by the terms of the undertaking from the date on which it was signed. His obligation was clear. His duty was to immediately 76 stop providing medical marihuana authorizations to Health Canada. It is also clear and unambiguous that Dr. Saul had an obligation to post signage informing his patients that he had relinquished prescribing privileges with respect to certain drugs. The wording of such a sign is spelled out: “Dr. Saul has relinquished his prescribing privileges with respect to Narcotic Drugs, Narcotic Preparations, Controlled Drugs, Benzodiazepines and/or Other Targeted Substances”. The fact that his patients used a common waiting room or that he lacked a private waiting room in no way diminishes his obligation. The clear intent of the undertaking is to inform patients that he no longer had prescribing privileges. His obligation was to immedi ][H