Debtfree DIGI March 2016 | Page 33

Mr. Peter Michaels made a spirited presentation toward the close of the day and broached the topic of recent industry updates in the wake of the amendments to the NCA last year. He also touched on all the sub committees being formed by the NCR organised Credit Industry Forum (CIF). Some of the upcoming projects include: Section 103(5), Clarity on Withdrawal Guidelines, End Balance Disputes, the NCR Debt Help System, PBLs, Reckless Lending Process (when complaints/allegations are made to the NCR). He also touched on the recent court judgements regarding debt review. In one case a DC was forced to pay fees partially because they followed the NCR’s guideline on fees and caused the consumers vehicle to go into default (among other issues). He lightly glossed over that as he focussed on how there had been no plan (within the 60 days of review) to sell the consumers second house. He also touched on the Nedbank v Norris & Mag. Dumani case. The NCR feel that where the credit provider and consumer agree to lower the interest rates not doing so would prejudice the consumer. The NCR trying to figure out why consumers are wanting to/ are changing Debt Counsellors so much. It is causing havoc with their NCR Debt Help system and making lots of work for them. It also was said that Debt Counsellor training material has been updated in line with amendments to the NCA. Very exciting was a comment that the NCR will soon be releasing a very pro debt review brochure. Ms Legodi closed out the day by discouraging credit providers from reckless credit granting and saying the NCR want to see consumers maximising the use of debt review to address debt. THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY GOOD The venue and large number of attendees was great. Ms Legodi said that there will be a review of Debt Counselling fees (no indication of when and by who). BAD The NCR indicated that as per rumour they wish to take their non binding guidelines and try squeeze them into the Debt Counsellor conditions of registration (thus making them binding). This will no doubt lead to lots of applications to the NCT contesting this. UGLY The Cape Law Society presentation started out strong but ended ugly.