DDN October 2017 DDN_DIR_October2017 | Page 25

comment LegaL LIne FOCUS ON FAIRNESS The CQC has set new equality objectives, as Jenny Wilde explains UNDER THE EQUALITY ACT 2010, the CQC is legally required to set equality objectives at least every four years. In March 2017 the regulator revealed four new objectives that will have a direct impact on services. The first is around PERSON-CENTRED CARE and equality. Noting that leadership is required to make person-centred care a reality, the CQC found that some groups – including disabled people, people from black and minority ethnic groups, lesbian, gay and bisexual people, younger people and those aged over 75 – were less likely to say that they were involved in their care across a range of sectors. It also found that black and minority ethnic (BME) people and lesbian, gay and bisexual people reported poorer mental health than other groups. To combat this, the CQC has taken a series of steps, including adding a specific question to Provider Information Request forms (PIR) in relation to equality, and helping inspectors to ask the right questions and gather evidence. Providers must be sure that their service and the leaders carrying out regulated activities ensure that all MEDIA SAVVY If we are going to have a national discussion about drugs, then all sides of the argument have to be heard. The debate can’t just include recovering junkies and the soppy liberals who have been calling for cannabis to be legalised for decades, despite all the evidence that long-term use leads to www.drinkanddrugsnews.com Person- centred care is key to achieving these objectives and compliance with CQC regulations. service users are included in the planning and execution of their care. The second is ACCESSIBLE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION. With 11m people in the UK with hearing loss and almost 2m people living with sight loss, all publicly funded providers must now meet the Accessible Information Standard. This aims to improve the lives of people who need information to be communicated in a specific way. Although the standard doesn’t apply to private providers, it should still be seriously considered as good practice. The third objective is around EQUALITY AND THE WELL-LED PROVIDER. The equality aspects are now better developed in the key lines of enquiry (KLOEs), prompts and ratings characteristics in CQC’s new assessment frameworks for both health and social psychosis. We must also hear from the parents and children of addicts who have seen their families torn apart by drugs. And we must also hear from the cops, doctors and nurses who have to clean up the human ruin caused by them. We should also hear from those of us who have had our own experiences and discovered that, for all the fleeting moments of pleasure, drugs provide no happy ending for anyone. And they never will. Tony Parsons, Sun, 23 September Drug policy should not be entirely determined by scientific evidence on harms – what’s also important is how society conceptualises and tolerates different types of risk behaviour, and care services. Inspectors are now prompted to look for evidence that providers take account of equality characteristics for people using their services. Finally, there should be EQUAL ACCESS TO PATHWAYS OF CARE. The CQC has noted that people using health and social care services often need to use more than one service, known as a ‘pathway of care’. However, people in some groups may have difficulty accessing particular care pathways, such as GP servic es, which could lead to poorer outcomes for them. The CQC found that there can be barriers to accessing GP services for migrants, asylum seekers, gypsies and travellers, and pathways could be improved at a provider and local system level. This should be a consideration of any substance misuse service. Providers of substance misuse services must be aware of the importance of delivering care in line with these objectives, particu lar ly as the CQC are, quite rightly, prioritising how people from minority backgrounds experience services. Person-centred care is key to achieving these objectives and compliance with CQC regulations. Jenny Wilde is senior associate solicitor at Ridouts Solicitors, www.ridout-law.com The news, and the skews, in the national media how culture and history interact with policy priorities. However, it is still striking that people in the UK who wish to legally alter their states of consciousness through psychoactive drug use have little legal choice, and are directed by drugs policy towards some of the most harmful drugs available. Harry Sumnall, Guardian, 1 September Whether you meet an addict, visit a drug-addicted community or encounter the middle-class parents of an irreversibly cannabis-induced psychotic child, what is apparent is that it is drug use (not its prohibition) that has destroyed their lives, corrupted the community or compromised a child’s mental health. The truth is our law is liberal, not punitive. The casualties of drugs are casualties of uninhibited freedom, not of prohibition. Had the law stepped in, more young men and women would be alive today or have a future worth living. Kathy Gyngell, Guardian, 20 September The scandalous takeover of the BBC’s flagship Today programme by the drug lobby has just got even worse. You may recall a few weeks ago a drug propagandist giving out the street prices of cocaine (the buying and selling of which are imprisonable offences) quite unchallenged, on this programme. This is just one of many instances where the arguments of drug legalisers are prominently presented without serious challenge, on this and other BBC programmes. If, like me, you oppose this policy, you are hardly ever asked on. Peter Hitchens, Mail On Sunday, 3 September October 2017 | drinkanddrugsnews | 13