Dancefilm Visions #2 - 2018 | Page 46

44

I was shocked when I watched your film THE DÉRIVE and, especially, when I read the situation you filmed it: in a market in Tehran, Iran, where dance is forbidden. What was your dilemmas in the process of making your film?

There was so many dilemmas in the process! I was about to make something happen that was pretty complicated. Having considered the social situation of Iran, I knew that people are not familiar with dancing outdoors and was also a risk of being accused by the authorities.

I really wanted to make as many conscious choices as I could for my film, since to me, art is about making clear and defendable choices. But it all was so complicated. We spent days talking about the relationship between the performer and the place, performer and camera, camera and other people, the pathways we wanted to go through in the market, how we want to explore music and environment sounds and many other things. The film was supposed to be taken in one take, and we could not try that as much as we needed, because then we might have made a buzz and don’t get what we actually wanted from the very natural atmosphere of the market.

Actually, a few shopkeepers had noticed us that we keep practising something! Particularly the part that I run, because we had to practice that a good few times for the camera to get the right speed and organization. I once heard the shopkeeper saying that it’s a week that I see this boy (the cameraman) is chasing this girl in this alley! (even though we had done that only for a few times! :)) )

For the process, we kept going to the location and scouting it for almost a month, it was for both of us to know the place and kind of people who pass through that market, shopkeepers and also discuss the idea. I also needed that to be more relaxed while moving through people. We had only three full runs which in one of them the camera wasn’t even recording! So quite a few times! The other matter was that what camera should we use? We finally decided to use an Osmo+ camera because it was more fluid, and Milad, my cinematographer did an amazing job moving through people without bumping into anyone. But the drawback of Osmo was that it was attracting more attention because of it’s weird shape!

So there was many choices to be made and a comprehensive understanding of the place and people was essential for both of us. I actually do consider the camera as a dance element in this film, Milad was definitely dancing and making very clear and conscious choices in the moment and he was very present in his movement. The good thing was that we were only two of us! We didn’t need to get along with a big crew!

What did people around you say about this idea?

Well, I didn’t talk about it a lot before doing it. But of course not many people was supportive of the idea considering the consequences. I was however determined to do this. The chosen movements are however, very conservative and I didn’t want to make a big deal out of it to fall in trouble later. After all, the film is not about dancing in Iran! It has so much more layers and philosophies about the relationship of individuals and society that can be of course more oriented around them.