Relationships between Foot Type and Dynamic Rearfoot Frontal Plane Motion
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to acknowledge the contributions
of Associate Professor Richard Smith and Mr. Ray Patton
(University of Sydney) for assistance with laboratory
requirements.
REFERENCES
1. Kaufman K, Brodine S, Shaffer R, Johnson C, Cullison
T: The effect of foot structure and range of motion on
musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 1999,
27:585-593.
2. Murphy D, Connolly D, Beynnon B: Risk factors for lower
extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med
2003, 37(1):13-29.
11. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM: The arch index: A useful
measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987, 20(5):547-551.
3. Williams Iii, McClay IS, Hamill J: Arch structure and injury
patterns in runners. Clin Biomech 2001, 16(4):341-347. 12. Payne C, Chuter V: The clash between theory and
science on the kinematic effectiveness of foot orthoses.
Clin Pod Med Surg 2001, 18(4):705-13.
4. Hunt AE, Fahey AJ, Smith RM: Static measures of calcaneal
deviation and arch angle as predictors of rearfoot motion
during walking. Aust J Physiother 2000, 46(1):9-16. 13. Diss CE: The reliability of kinetic and kinematic
variables used to analyze normal running gait. Gait
Posture 2001, 14(2):98-103.
5. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW: The relationship between static
lower extremity measurements and rearfoot motion during
walking. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996, 24(5):309-314. 14. Keenan AM, Redmond AC, Horton M, Conaghan PG,
Tennant A: The foot posture index: rasch analysis of a
novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med
Rehab 2007, 88(1):88-93.
6. Hamill J, Bates BT, Knutzen KM, Kirkpatrick GM: Relationship
between selected static and dynamic lower extremity
measures. Clin Biomech 1989, 4:217-225.
7. McPoil TG, Cornwall MW: Relationship between three static
angles of the rearfoot and the pattern of rearfoot motion
during walking. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996, 23(6):370-
375.
8. Nakhaee Z, Rahimi A, Abaee M, Rezasoltani A, Kalantari
KK: The relationship between the height of the medial
longitudinal arch (MLA) and the ankle and knee injuries in
professional runners. The Foot 2008, 18(2):84-90.
9. Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA: Development and
validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot
posture: The Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech 2006, 21(1):89-
98.
28
10. Nielsen RG, Rathleff M, Kersting UG, Simonsen O,
Moelgaard C, Jensen K, Olesen CG, Lundbye Christensen
S, Kaalund S: The predictive value of the foot posture
index on dynamic function. J Foot Ankle Res 2008, 1(Suppl
1):O37.
Pedorthic Footcare Association | www.pedorthics.org
15. Minichiello V, Sullivan G, Greenwood K, Axford R,
eds: Handbook of Reasearch Methods in Health Sciences
Addison Wesley Longman Australia Pty Limited: Sydney;
1999.
16. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG: Classification of frontal
plane rearfoot motion patterns during the stance phase of
walking. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2009, 99(5):399-405.
17. Dorsey W, McClay Davis I, Baitch SP: Effect of inverted
orthoses on lower extremity mechanics in runners. Med
Sci Sport Exerc 2003, 35(12):2060-2068.
18. Stacoff A, Reinschmidt C, Nigg BM, van den Bogert AJ,
Lundberg A, Denoth J, Stüssi E: Effects of foot orthoses
on skeletal motion during running. Clin Biomech 2000,
15(1):54-64.