ups .
10.1 cm
Within groups p values
Between groups
38 ) = 8.342 , p < 0.001 , η2 = 0.202 ), C2 ( F ( 3 , 38 ) = 14.498 , p < 0.001 , η2 = 0.202 ), C3 ( F ( 3 , 38 ) = 10.428 , p < 0.001 , η2 = 0.202 ), and C5 ( F ( 3 , 38 ) = 10.920 , p < 0.001 , η2 = 0.202 ). No significant effect of HHS wearing experience was found on the equilibrium score . Post hoc analysis revealed significantly lower equilibrium score in 10.1 cm than seven cm HHS among experienced HHS wearers in C2 ( p = 0.035 , 95 % CI [ 0.143 – 5.590 ]).
Two-way interaction
28.80 ± 7.30 0.044 0.146 0.576
3.00 ± 1.56 < 0.001 0.759 0.579 4.45 ± 2.24 0.015 0.359 0.798 6.50 ± 2.31 0.082 0.359 0.798 3.45 ± 1.64 < 0.001 0.089 0.314 6.55 ± 2.80 < 0.001 0.337 0.970 8.20 ± 3.02 < 0.001 0.622 0.328
The main effect of HH was significant for the strategy score in six conditions ( F ( 3 , 38 ) = 12.234 , p < 0.001 , η2 = 0.176 ; F ( 3 , 38 ) = 29.763 , p < 0.001 , η2 = 0.271 ; F ( 3 , 38 ) = 21.591 , p < 0.001 , η2 = 0.356 ; F ( 3 , 38 ) = 3.125 , p = 0.036 , η2 = 0.074 ; F ( 3 , 38 ) = 10.598 , p < 0.001 , η2 = 0.214 ; F ( 3 , 38 ) = 5.601 , p = 0.002 , η2 = 0.126 ). The main effect of wearing experience was also significant in C3 ( F ( 1 , 40 ) = 10.841 , p = 0.002 , η2 = 0.218 ), C5 ( F ( 1 , 40 ) = 4.977 , p = 0.032 , η2 = 0.022 ), and C6 ( F ( 1 , 40 ) = 5.857 , p = 0.020 , η2 = 0.132 ). The strategy score decreased significantly when HH increased to seven cm compared with flat shoes among experienced HHS wearers in C5 ( p = 0.001 , 95 % CI = 0.997 – 4.036 ). In C3 , the experienced HHS wearers demonstrated significantly higher strategy score than inexperienced HHS wearers in flat shoes ( t = −2.231 , p = 0.033 ), 3.9 cm ( t = − 2.404 , p = 0.023 ), and 10.1 cm HHS ( t = − 3.327 , p = 0.002 ; Table 3 ).
Table 3 illustrates that the main effect of HH was significant for sensory analysis score in SOM ( F ( 3 , 38 ) = 3.059 , p = 0.031 , η2 = 0.099 ) and VIS ( F ( 3 , 38 ) = 4.270 , p = 0.010 , η2 = 0.099 ), but the main effect of wearing experience was undetected . Post hoc analysis showed that the sensory analysis score declined significantly in VIS when wearing 10.1 cm HHS compared with flat shoes in inexperienced wearers ( p = 0.008 , 95 % CI [ 1.470 – 12.244 ]).
MCT
No significant interaction between the HH and wearing experience was detected on outcome measures of MCT . As shown in Table 4 , the main effect of HH was significant for the composite latency ( F ( 3 , 38 ) = 3.121 , p = 0.044 ,
Current Pedorthics | January-February 2022 51