CONTEMPORARY EURASIA VIII (2) ContEurVIII2 | Page 25

CONTEMPORARY EURASIA VIII (2) Chumbadze (2014) explains the pro-Western direction of Georgia favored by all post-independence Georgian governments and by the overwhelming majority of the population with three facts. First, Georgians have always seen Europe as a source of “sustainable and democratic state development” and the basis for the “stability and invulnerability” of a multiethnic country like Georgia. Second, the Euro- Atlantic bloc is regarded as “the only safety guarantee” politically, economically, and militarily. Finally, Georgians have considered themselves Europeans, and integration with the West is a return after a long separation 13 . Another critical moment in Russian-Georgian relations was the 2008 Russo-Georgian War that significantly shaped the geopolitics in the South Caucasus. Mikheil Saakashvili’s eagerness to accelerate Georgia’s inclusion into Western institutions became a problem for Russia due to the possibility of the enlargement of NATO. 14 Besides, Russian presence in the two secessionist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia created additional tension in the relations of the two countries that culminated in the Russo-Georgian War. After the war, Russia recognized the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. 15 During the war and later on, the Armenian government under the presidency of Serzh Sargsyan did not openly favor any of the parties, although the country suffered significant economic damages from the war amounting to more than $670 million 16 as most of Armenia’s transit routes pass through Georgia. In the same context, another source of tension in Armenian- Georgian relations is the presence of the Russian 102 nd military base in Gyumri, Armenia. 17 Hamilton argues that the five thousand troops                                                              13 Ketevan Chumbadze, “Foreign Policy Dimension of the Georgian-Armenian Bilateral Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities for the Future Cooperation” in Armenian – Georgian Relations: Challenges and Opportunities for the Bilateral Cooperation, (Yerevan, Political Science Association of Armenia 2014), 71-85. 14 Cory Welt, “Georgia: Background and U.S. Policy”, Congressional Research Service (2019), 13, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R45307.pdf. 15 Mitat Çelikpala, “Not a Single Step Ahead: Turkey and the South Caucasus in 2009” in Identities, Ideologies and Institutions: 2001-2011 A Decade of Insight Into the Caucasus (Yerevan: Caucasus Institute, 2011), 194-211. 16 Nona Mikhelidze, “After the 2008 Russia-Georgia War: Implications for the Wider Caucasus. The International Spectator”, Italian Journal of International Affairs 44, no. 3 (2009): 27-42. 17 Sergey Minasyan, “New Challenges and Opportunities for Armenia and Georgia in the Context of Regional Security” in Armenia and Georgia in the Context of Current Political 25