Connections Quarterly Summer 2020 - Dialogues Across Difference | Page 33

D I ALO G UE: A P L A N FO R THE 2 0 2 0 E L E C TI O N promote their agendas and engage with political issues. However, we might be surprised at how few adults are driving the conversation. According to a 2019 Pew Research report, only 22% of the American public uses Twitter. “ The Twit- ter conversation about national politics among U.S. adult users is driven by a small number of prolific political tweet- ers. These users make up just 6% of all U.S. adults with public accounts on the site, but they account for 73% of tweets from American adults that mention na- tional politics.” 8 profiteers, marketers, and activist organi- zations can spread moralized content by capitalizing on natural tendencies of our perceptional systems.” 9 #6. The language Democrats and Re- publicans use to describe the charac- ter traits of the opposing party has grown worse since 2016. Pew Research released new data in October 2019 showing that Republicans and Demo- crats describe one another as closed- minded, unpatriotic, immoral, lazy, and unintelligent. The survey also found that those who are highly attentive to politics are most likely to express negative senti- ments about the opposing party. 10 #5. Moral and emotional content on social media is intentionally used to capture our attention. A 2019 study in Journal of Experimental Psychology, researchers conclude social media con- tent that has moral and emotional con- tent will capture our attention more than other content. The studies suggest “that attentional capture is one basic psycho- logical process that helps explain the increased diffusion of moral and emo- tional content during political discourse on social media, and sheds light on ways in which political leaders, disinformation #7. When deepest beliefs are chal- lenged, the brain turns on its self- defense mode. A recent Vox article explores Jonas Kaplan’s, USC’s Brain and Creativity Institute, research that studied brain activity in people when their deepest beliefs were challenged. Although the study is limited, Kaplan concludes that when participants were challenged, there was more activity in the parts of the brain that correspond to 8. “Small Share of U.S. Adults Produce Majority of Political Tweets.” Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 2 Jan. 2020, www.people-press.org/2019/10/23/national-politics-on-twitter-small-share-of-u-s-adults-produce-majority-of- tweets/. 9. Brady, William J, et al. “Attentional Capture Helps Explain Why Moral and Emotional Content Go Viral.” Journal of Experi- mental Psychology. General, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 5 Sept. 2019, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31486666. 10. “How Partisans View Each Other.” Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 31 Dec. 2019, www.people-press. org/2019/10/10/how-partisans-view-each-other/. Continues on page 32 CSEE Connections Summer 2020 Page 31