“Free Energy” Impact,
Breaking Power Balance: Who Might Lose? 2
• -->>cont: Conven,onal Green Energy: innova,on:
WIND(need more than just large aeroelas5c blades/direct drive generators. If
invested sufficiently, technically easy for majors to develop new techs), eg:
WhalePower(F Fish), Riblet film tech, Honeywell-Windtronics(Im Mahawili),
Selsam turbine, Large maglev rotor - VAWT, Extreme weather:
Icewind(Asgeirsson), Contra-rota5ng turbines(Counter iner5a & mutual
recovery of turbine wind), Sweep Twist Adop5ve Rotor, Hydrosta5c Wind
turbine, Sway Turbine(Ey Borgen), Regenera5ve braking(Ena Yelkapan+), etc,
see also p90-94
SOLAR: Schabflander’s Ga+Al type solar cell hydrogen electrolysis combine,
Use of High performance ThermoElectric/photovoltaic etc device for solar heat
conversion etc, see also p75-89
Biomass & WtE- eg: Full use of Sub/SuperCri8cal water for liquefac8on &
gasifica8on, Cold or Steam Plasma, Hot Plasma gasifica8on with MHD power
recovery etc
• Larger more important ramifica/on of related vested interests: Investment
funds, Collaterals, CDS, Tax revenue, Science-Media credibility, Peer Review
“science exclusion system”, Enviro-Energy NGOs & Research funding -->>cont:
333
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada