“ Free Energy” Impact, Breaking Power Balance: Who Might Lose?
• Oil, N-gas, Coal related; Infra, Storage, Transport, Chemical process( eg“ free” electrolysis of water & cryogenic air for nitrogen to make Nitrogen fer? lizer / Ammonia, Chemical separa? on by " freely compressed air” operated Vortex tube): Need to lower cost, develop new industrial process & product, end-use R & D( eg mix with HHO, use Super Cri? cal water for refining / liquifying, Use shallow CoalBed Methane or Gas Hydrate, incorporate CO2 recovery hydrocarbon produc? on – see below),
• Also their " fossil fuel " groups ' geopoli? cal gain might exist if they use abio6c hydrocarbon produc6on idea that is at least par? ally virtually undeniable at this stage in order to combat CO2 exclusive catastrophic global warming idea: but currently hydrocarbon industry is heavily controlled by interlocked mainstream group that also holds strong stake in environmental industries, gov ' t, media, intel, commercial bank etc hence concerted mainstream appeal is
unlikely to occur
• Conven6onal Cost Green Energy: Need to con? nue to implement unused fundamentally different / modified concepts- mechanics, Specific niche for: Time- Loca? on-Posi? oning-Raw material-Non EM environment needs etc, Once failed tech or previously rejected tech should be revisited, examples:-- >> cont:
332 linkedin. com / in / newnatureparadigm-Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada